Castle Hill Solar Farm Willerby Low Road Cottingham East Riding Of Yorkshire HU16 5JQ Data via plota.co.uk

26/01795/PLF - Full Planning Permission Pending Consideration

Proposal

Installation of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) compound with a 2.35m high palisade fence and a CCTV camera mounted to existing substation, a small extension to internal vehicular access road to BESS, realignment of an existing 2.4m high boundary fencing, partial relocation of ground mounted solar panels with associated infrastructure (Retrospective Application) and construction of attenuation basin and swale for surface water drainage to watercourse Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
21 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 20 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 28 Oct 2026; it is now day 68.

The consultation period closed on 23 Sept 2026.

Documents 25

Statements & assessments 18

PDF FLOODLIGHT DETAILS Supporting Documents · 21 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (4E OF 6) Supporting Documents · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF THE STATUTORY BIODIVERSITY METRIC CALCULATION Supporting Documents · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (4A OF 6) Supporting Documents · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (4B OF 6) Supporting Documents · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (4C OF 6) Supporting Documents · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (4D OF 6) Supporting Documents · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT STATEMENT Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF HERITAGE ADDENDUM Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (1 OF 6) Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (2 OF 6) Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (3 OF 6) Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (5 OF 6) Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY (6 OF 6) Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PLANNING, DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Documents · 13 Jul 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project 1341 m away: Dogger Bank D Wind Farm, at pre-application.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Riding - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Permission
Postcode
HU16 5JQ
Received
13 Jul 2026
Validated
21 Aug 2026
Ward
Cottingham South
Parish
Cottingham Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
20 Nov 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Pegasus Planning Group

Decision outlook

Day 68, past the statutory target. 92% of commercial and major works in East Riding are decided within thirteen weeks, which runs to 20 Nov 2026; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 23 Oct 2026.

Day 6812 days past the 56-day target
80%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
124decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by East Riding in the last twelve months, from validation. East Riding decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 supporting

Last counted 23 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15035621
Planning Portal ref
PP-15035621
Comments by
23 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
East Riding
Planning Authority Score
8.1/10
Excellent
#24 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Riding is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #7 out of 296. Only 14% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Riding decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #110 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #152 of 296
95%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #7 of 296
14%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #9 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
190 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
42 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
79 decided
1,887
Total decisions
198 refused in the year to March 2026