Lartington Water Treatment Works Cotherstone Barnard Castle DL12 9DP Data via plota.co.uk

DM/25/02836/DRC - Details Reserved by Condition Approved

Proposal

Disacharge of Conditions 19 (Archaeological Reporting), 26 (Rail Safety) and 27 (Drainage) of Planning Permission Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Oct 2025
✓
Validated
13 Oct 2025
✓
Consultation
18 Dec 2025
✓
Approved
13 Jan 2026
✗
Appeal dismissed
1 Jun 2026

Approved on 13 Jan 2026 · DRC Delegated · Last checked 10 Oct 2026

Documents 3

Consultation & comments 2

PDF LLFA - SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Consultee Comment · 11 Nov 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Consultee Comment · 27 Oct 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 9, 19, 26, 27 discharged

Site constraints 4

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 4.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 10 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Durham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Durham
Application type
Details Reserved by Condition
Postcode
DL12 9DP
Received
10 Oct 2025
Validated
13 Oct 2025
Ward
Upper Teesdale
Parish
Cotherstone
Case officer
Show
Target decision
14 Jan 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
13 Jan 2026
Decision level
DRC Delegated
Appeal
Dismissed · 1 Jun 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 6003802 ↗
Applicant
Show
Agent
Lichfields

How this decision compares

Decided in 92 days from validation, 42 days slower than Durham's median of 50 for discharge of conditions. Approved, as 99% of discharge of conditions here are.

62%decided within 8 weeks
99%approved
379decided in the last year

Plota live figures for discharge of conditions decided by Durham in the last twelve months, from validation. Durham decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 10 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14370969
Planning Portal ref
PP-14370969
Consultation
18 Dec 2025
Comments by
8 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
8 Dec 2025
Env. assessment
No
Durham
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#137 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Durham ranks #190 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Durham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #52 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #29 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #190 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #213 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
95 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
49 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
201 decided
1,706
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026