Fox Warren Stables Sheepcote Dell Road Beamond End Buckinghamshire HP7 0QT Data via plota.co.uk

Decided PL/25/6067/EU
Council
Buckinghamshire 1.3/10
Date received
around 26 Nov 2025
Date validated
26 Nov 2025
Postcode
HP7 0QT

Description

Certificate of lawfulness to confirm the commencement of development of planning permission (Change of use of land to residential, construction of detached dwelling with detached triple garage, parking and landscaping following demolition of stable block and associated outbuildings) Data via plota.co.uk

Get alerts nearby Council site ↗

Last checked

Site constraints 8

2 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Stud Cottage, Grade II, the postcode pin is inside its outline · 2 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Chilterns National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Article 4 direction
Whole District excluding the Town of Chesham - Poultry production.. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Priority habitat about 8 m away: No main habitat but additional habitats present.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 7 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Buckinghamshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Other new applications on this street

22 Sept 2026Pending

Beamond End Ranch Beamond End Lane Beamond End Buckinghamshire HP7 0QT

Subdivision of existing curtilage and conversion of garage to single dwellinghou...

PL/26/07648/FA
21 Sept 2026Pending

Penn Wood House Beamond End Lane Beamond End Buckinghamshire HP7 0QT

Householder application for the construction of a part two storey/part single st...

PL/26/07594/FA

Nearby new applications

22 Sept 2026Pending

Beamond End Ranch Beamond End Lane Beamond End Buckinghamshire HP7 0QT

Subdivision of existing curtilage and conversion of garage to single dwellinghou...

PL/26/07648/FA
21 Sept 2026Pending

Penn Wood House Beamond End Lane Beamond End Buckinghamshire HP7 0QT

Householder application for the construction of a part two storey/part single st...

PL/26/07594/FA
31 Jul 2026Approved

Beamond End Ranch Beamond End Lane Beamond End Buckinghamshire HP7 0QT

Removal of condition 2 (agricultural occupancy) attached to planning permission ...

PL/26/06167/VRC
Buckinghamshire
Planning Authority Score
1.3/10
Poor
#284 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Buckinghamshire is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #280 out of 296. 55% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Buckinghamshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #217 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #241 of 296
34%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #280 of 296
55%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #248 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
491 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
71 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
131 decided
4,446
Total decisions
690 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings