Vodafone Limited Telecommunications Mast (Vodafone 37721) A1036 Junction With A64 Copmanthorpe York Data via plota.co.uk

25/01329/TCNOT - Telecommunication Notice Approved

Proposal

Notification under section 5 of The Electronic Communications Code (Conditions and Restrictions) Regulations 2003 for the following equipment; the removal of the existing 15m high lattice tower and replace it with a 22.50m monopole. Further works include the proposed installation of 3 no. antennas, 9 no. RRUs, 2 no. 300mm dishes, 1 no. 600mm dish and 4 no. equipment cabinets. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
1 Jul 2025
✓
Approved
22 Jul 2025
✗
Appeal dismissed
20 Apr 2026

Approved on 22 Jul 2025 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 17 Oct 2026

Site constraints 5

Green belt: York
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 1, surveyed
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: Natural England's post-1988 ALC field survey (Leeds). Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2; the survey is the definitive reading.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI 143 m away: Askham Bog SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 15 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in York - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
York
Application type
Telecommunication Notice
Received
1 Jul 2025
Validated
1 Jul 2025
Ward
Copmanthorpe
Parish
Copmanthorpe Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
29 Jul 2025
Decision
No Objections from LPA
Decision date
22 Jul 2025
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Appeal
Dismissed · 20 Apr 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 3376815 ↗
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 21 days from validation, 4 days faster than York's median of 25 for prior approvals. Approved, as 87% of prior approvals here are.

95%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
215decided in the last year

Plota live figures for prior approvals decided by York in the last twelve months, from validation. York decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 17 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
29 Jul 2025
Env. assessment
No
York
Planning Authority Score
3.7/10
Below average
#213 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

York ranks #156 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
York decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #255 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #237 of 296
64%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #156 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #168 of 296
69%
Minor dwellings approved
104 decided (1-9 homes)
71%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
63%
Change of use approved
68 decided
1,278
Total decisions
224 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use