Land South Of Hunsdon Farm, Hunsdon, Ivybridge Data via plota.co.uk

1249/26/FUL - Full Planning Application Approved
DemolitionNew homes

Proposal

Demolition and replacement of a dwelling Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 May 2026
✓
Validated
18 May 2026
✓
Approved
3 Jul 2026

Approved on 3 Jul 2026 · Last checked 7 Sept 2026

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Associated applications 2

Site constraints 4

Public footpath about 14 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Ermington built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 19 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Hams - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
South Hams
Application type
Full Planning Application
Received
6 May 2026
Validated
18 May 2026
Ward
Ermington & Ugborough
Parish
Ermington
Case officer
Show
Decision
Approved
Decision date
3 Jul 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Greenslade Taylor Hunt

How this decision compares

Decided in 46 days from validation, 7 days faster than South Hams's median of 53 for demolitions. Approved, as 91% of demolitions here are.

68%decided within 8 weeks
91%approved
62decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by South Hams in the last twelve months, from validation. South Hams decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
20 May 2026
Comments by
25 Jun 2026
South Hams
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#89 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Hams is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #97 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Hams decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #116 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #165 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #97 of 296
32%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #69 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
130 decided (1-9 homes)
70%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
26 decided
1,018
Total decisions
101 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings