Leatherhead Golf Club Kingston Road Leatherhead KT22 0EE Data via plota.co.uk

26/01515/AAC - Adjoining Authority Consultation Approved

Proposal

: Demolition of existing clubhouse building and erection of a new clubhouse facility along with 40-bedroom hotel, bar/restaurant, conferencing facilities and fitness/wellbeing suite; remodelling of the existing 18-hole golf course and driving range, the construction of an irrigation water storage lake and ornamental lakes along with extensive native planting throughout. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
9 Jul 2026
Consultation
10 Jul 2026
Approved
9 Aug 2026

Approved on 9 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 9 Aug 2026

Site constraints 5

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National nature reserve 127 m away: Ashtead Common
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
SSSI 66 m away: Epsom and Ashtead Commons SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Kingston upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Adjoining Authority Consultation
Postcode
KT22 0EE
Received
9 Jul 2026
Validated
9 Jul 2026
Ward
Out Of Borough
Case officer
Show
Target decision
30 Jul 2026
Decision
No Objection
Decision date
9 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 31 days from validation, 25 days faster than Kingston upon Thames's median of 56 for demolitions. Approved, as 86% of demolitions here are.

82%decided within 8 weeks
86%approved
165decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Kingston upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Kingston upon Thames decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 9 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
10 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Kingston upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
6.5/10
Good
#76 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Kingston upon Thames is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #33 out of 296. Only 20% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Kingston upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Kingston upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
75%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #288 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #266 of 296
81%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #33 of 296
20%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #18 of 296
44%
Minor dwellings approved
124 decided (1-9 homes)
60%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
42%
Change of use approved
26 decided
1,112
Total decisions
274 refused in the year to March 2026