26 Whyburn Lane, Hucknall, Nottinghamshire, NG15 6QN Data via plota.co.uk

V/2026/0481 Approved

Proposal

Proposal for a two storey and single storey rear extensions and associated internal alterations Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
1 Oct 2026

Approved on 1 Oct 2026 · Last checked 3 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Hucknall built-up area; Green belt 31 m away: Derby and Nottingham; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Ashfield - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Ashfield
Postcode
NG15 6QN
Received
3 Aug 2026
Validated
3 Aug 2026
Ward
Hucknall West
Case officer
Show
Target decision
27 Sept 2026
Decision
FULCC - Full Application - Conditional Consent
Decision date
1 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Mckenzie Tilson

How this decision compares

Decided in 59 days from validation, 13 days slower than Ashfield's median of 46 for extensions. Approved, as 86% of extensions here are.

86%decided within 8 weeks
86%approved
187decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Ashfield in the last twelve months, from validation. Ashfield decision record →

Ashfield
Planning Authority Score
5.5/10
Average
#118 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Ashfield is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #83 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Ashfield decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #215 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #238 of 296
74%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #83 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #82 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
65 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
16 decided (10+ homes)
72%
Change of use approved
43 decided
425
Total decisions
69 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use