Land To Rear Of Boars Tye Residential Home Boars Tye Road Silver End Essex Data via plota.co.uk

Pending 26/01826/DAC
Date received
around 5 Aug 2026
Date validated
5 Aug 2026
Postcode
CM8 3QA

Description

Discharge of condition 5 (Biodiversity Enhancement Layout) , 6 (Contamination) , 8 (Materials) , 9 (Windows/Doors) & 10 (Archaeology) OF Data via plota.co.uk

Last checked

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Fullcouncil archive

    Conditions 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 awaiting decision

    • ConditionsDischarge of condition 5 (Biodiversity Enhancement Layout), 6 (Contamination), 8 (Materials)…This application26/01826/DAC

Site constraints 6

20 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Boars Tye Farmhouse, Grade II, about 7 m from the postcode pin · 20 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 20 with distances
Historic England ↗
Silver End conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Heritage at risk: Silver End
On the register of historic places assessed as at risk.
A designated building, monument, park or conservation area assessed as at risk from neglect, decay or development. Proposals that secure its future are looked on favourably.
Historic England ↗
National infrastructure project about 1032 m away: Norwich to Tilbury
The site is about 1032 m from the project boundary. Electricity line, examination closed, recommendation due. Also within 2 km: Rivenhall IWMF and Energy Centre (decided, about 1293 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Silver End built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Braintree - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service
Braintree
Planning Authority Score
7/10
Good
#61 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Braintree is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #47 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Braintree decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #189 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #148 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #47 of 296
33%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #71 of 296
62%
Minor dwellings approved
119 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
91%
Change of use approved
11 decided
927
Total decisions
132 refused in the year to March 2026