Six-bedroom HMO at 54 Auckland Drive, Brighton

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Brighton And Hove Planning Committee on 3 Dec 2025.

BH2025/02421Approved

What was proposed

The application sought to change a residential dwelling into a six-bedroom, six-person HMO, with associated alterations including changes to windows.

“Planning permission is sought for the change of use from a residential dwelling (C3) to a 6no bedroom small house in multiple occupation (C4), with associated alterations, including amendments to fenestration.”

Officer report

The site

The site is a semi-detached, two-storey dwelling beside fields and near a business park, outside a conservation area and not listed.

“The application site comprises a semi-detached two storey dwelling located on the eastern side of Auckland Drive in Bevendean. The property has brick walls and tiled roof, and the loft has been converted into further habitable space, with a rear dormer and front rooflights. The dwelling is set back from the road edge and has a stepped access from the elevated pavement.”

“The site is not a listed building and is not within a Conservation Area. There are also no locally listed buildings within the vicinity. The site backs onto fields and is a short distance from the Hyde Business Park.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier advice found the proposed change could comply with the main HMO policy, and a 2017 loft conversion with dormer and rooflights was approved.

“PRE2025/00081 - Change of use from (C3) dwelling to (C4) small HMO (three to six unrelated occupants). Pre-application advice summary: The proposed change of use would comply with policy CP21 of the City Plan Part One as there are not more than 10% of properties in use as HMOs within 50m of the site.”

“BH2017/02817 - Certificate of lawfulness for proposed loft conversion incorporating rear dormer with front rooflights. Approved 16.10.2017”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the proposal met HMO, accommodation, design, amenity and transport requirements, subject to conditions.

“The main considerations in the determination of this application relate to whether the creation of a C4 HMO would be acceptable in terms of the standard of accommodation, the impacts of the development on neighbour amenity and transport matters.”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

No nearby HMOs were identified within 50 metres, the wider HMO proportion was 5.41%, and the proposed rooms and communal areas were considered acceptable.

“The proposed HMO layout would have a kitchen/dining space and separate living space on the ground floor, collectively these spaces measure at 27.5sqm. The layout of these spaces is considered acceptable with regard to natural ventilation and outlook for future occupiers. The proposed communal space exceeds the minimum required of 4sqm per person (24sqm for six-person occupancy).”

“There are three shower rooms within the proposed layout. Bedrooms and living areas are either on the same floor as bathroom amenities or within one floor of them. It is considered that one shower room on the ground floor and two on the first floor is acceptable.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Private Sector Housing said an HMO licence would be required, while Housing Strategy made no comment and transport comments were awaited.

“Private Sector Housing: Comment Should the application be approved then the applicant will be required to apply for an HMO Licence. This can be done online via the council's website.”

Officer report

Objections received

Twenty-six individuals objected over matters including noise, parking, overdevelopment, antisocial behaviour, loss of a family home and residential amenity.

“Representations have been received from 26 (Twenty Six) individuals, objecting to the proposed development for the following reasons: • Family area does not need more HMOs…”

“OFFRPT • Detrimental effect on property values • Noise • Impact on residential amenity • Overdevelopment • Overshadowing • Additional traffic and highway stress • Increased demand for parking • Poor waste management with student properties/HMOs • Antisocial behaviour and drug taking • Council stated no more HMOs would be created. • Negative impact on the wellbeing of existing residents • Overcrowded and overdeveloped HMO accommodation.”

Officer report

The committee vote

The application was not called for discussion, so the officer recommendation was agreed unanimously.

“This application was not called for discussion. The officer recommendation was therefore taken as having been agreed unanimously.”

Minutes

The decision

Planning permission was granted subject to conditions covering drawings, appearance, layout, cycle parking and soundproofing.

“That the Committee has taken into consideration and agrees with the reasons for the recommendation set out below and resolves to GRANT planning permission subject to the following Conditions and Informatives:”

“Notwithstanding the approved plans, the development hereby permitted shall not be occupied until the cycle parking facilities shown on the approved plans have been fully implemented and made available for use. Rather than be installed in front of the property as shown on the plans, the cycle store (as drawn on drawing 02 received 30th September 2025) shall be installed to the side of the single storey existing single storey side extension behind the existing fence.”

Officer report

Sources

  • Brighton And Hove Planning Committee minutes, 3 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Brighton And Hove's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 3 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

44 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →