EDL Operations Mucking Wharf Road Stanford Le Hope Essex SS17 0RN Data via plota.co.uk

25/00945/CV - Condition Removal/Variation Awaiting decision

Proposal

Application for the variation of condition nos. 2 (Extension to the date to complete the approved restoration of the site.) of planning permission ref. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
5 Aug 2025
Decision
Target date was 4 Nov 2025

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 28 Oct 2026; it is now day 449.

The consultation period closed on 18 Sept 2025.

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    VariationApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 2 variation sought

    • VariationApplication for the variation of condition nos. 2 (Extension to the date to complete…This application25/00945/CV

Site constraints 11

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Tilbury to Southend across the site
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site; the route and its margin are protected.
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From the sea. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 1364 m away: Lower Thames Crossing; Radon affected area, class 2; Nature improvement area: Greater Thames Marshes; Ramsar wetland about 443 m away: Thames Estuary & Marshes; SSSI about 443 m away: Mucking Flats and Marshes SSSI; Priority habitat about 12 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 16 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Thurrock - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Thurrock
Application type
Condition Removal/Variation
Postcode
SS17 0RN
Received
5 Aug 2025
Validated
5 Aug 2025
Ward
OLD Stanford Le Hope West
Case officer
Show
Target decision
4 Nov 2025
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 449, past the statutory target. 82% of amendments in Thurrock are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 22 Oct 2026.

Day 449393 days past the 56-day target
67%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
69decided in the last year

Plota live figures for amendments decided by Thurrock in the last twelve months, from validation. Thurrock decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 objecting

33 neighbours consulted · Last counted 22 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
18 Sept 2025
Site or press notice
28 Aug 2025
Statutory expiry
4 Nov 2025
Env. assessment
No
Thurrock
Planning Authority Score
6/10
Average
#104 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Thurrock is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #25 out of 296. Thurrock is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Thurrock decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #252 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #271 of 296
84%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #25 of 296
31%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #62 of 296
65%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
43%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
43 decided
671
Total decisions
124 refused in the year to March 2026