Beesons Yard Bury Lane Rickmansworth Hertfordshire Data via plota.co.uk

25/1671/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Variation of Condition 2 (Plans) and 25 (Obscure Windows) pursuant to planning permission to allow alterations to fenestration detailing, omission of terrace balconies, addition of AOV rooflights and submission of hard and soft landscaping details including landscape management. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
29 Sept 2025
✓
Consultation
6 Nov 2025
✓
Approved
3 Jul 2026

Approved on 3 Jul 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 12 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Three Rivers Planning Committee on 16 Feb 2026. Earlier deferred on 22 Jan 2026.

Approved by 8 votes to 0

  • Residents and the community council raised concerns about reflective windows, light pollution, biodiversity, enforcement and departures from the approved scheme.
  • Members voted 8–0, with 2 abstentions, to grant permission subject to a deed of variation and planning conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposed changes, site history, objections, officer assessment, speakers, debate, vote and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Three Rivers's committee minutes of 16 Feb 2026.

Documents 35

Consultation & comments 17

PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 21 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 18 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF FURTHER COMMENT FROM BATCHWORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 16 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 12 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF COMMENT FROM BATCHWORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 25 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM BATCHWORTH COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 25 Nov 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 24 Nov 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 31 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 24 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 23 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 23 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 22 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 21 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 20 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF COMMENT FROM BATCHWORTH COMMUNITY COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 14 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 7 Oct 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 9

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Local nature reserve about 234 m away: Rickmansworth Aquadrome
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
Conservation area about 38 m away: Rickmansworth Town Centre; Radon affected area, class 2; National infrastructure project about 500 m away: Expansion of Heathrow Airport (Third Runway), at pre-application; Inside the Rickmansworth built-up area; Flood defence about 34 m from the postcode pin (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 50 year flood); Green belt about 86 m away: London.
Not affected
No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 13 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Three Rivers - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Received
29 Sept 2025
Validated
29 Sept 2025
Ward
Rickmansworth Town
Parish
Batchworth Community Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
3 Jul 2026
Decision
approved
Decision date
3 Jul 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show

Public comments

8comments received
8 objecting

100% object · above the UK average of 74%

187 neighbours consulted · Last counted 12 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14360992
Planning Portal ref
PP-14360992
Comments by
24 Dec 2025
Site or press notice
6 Nov 2025
Committee
16 Feb 2026
Statutory expiry
29 Dec 2025
Env. assessment
No
Three Rivers
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#54 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Three Rivers is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #30 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Three Rivers decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #145 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #184 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #30 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #28 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
94%
Change of use approved
17 decided
819
Total decisions
86 refused in the year to March 2026