3, Birnam Crescent, Chigwell, IG7 4FU Data via plota.co.uk

1820/26 - Householder Approved

Proposal

Rear conservatory. (Summary). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
16 Sept 2026

Approved on 16 Sept 2026 · Delegated C/Signed C. Zhandire · Last checked 17 Sept 2026

Site constraints 17

LBR LP38 (Protecting Trees and Enhancing the Landscape)LBR LP30 (Household Extensions)LBR LP26 (Promoting High Quality Design)LP D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach)LP D12 (Fire safety)LP G6 (Biodiversity and access to nature)NPPF DP2 Local design guides, design codes and masterplansNPPF DP3 Key principles for well-designed placesNPPF P3 Living conditions and pollution
Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Redbridge AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
LBR LP38 (Protecting Trees and Enhancing the Landscape)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP30 (Household Extensions)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP26 (Promoting High Quality Design)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP D12 (Fire safety)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP G6 (Biodiversity and access to nature)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF DP2 Local design guides, design codes and masterplansCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF DP3 Key principles for well-designed placesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF P3 Living conditions and pollutionCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Local nature reserve 487 m away: Hainault Forest; Public transport access: PTAL 0 (very poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Priority habitat 10 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £730,000 in December 2017. Detached house, freehold.

15 December 2017£730,000New build

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Building

Floor area160 m² (1,722 sq ft)
Energy ratingB (85 out of 100), could reach A
PropertyDetached house
Built2015
HeatingBoiler and radiators, mains gas
WallsAverage thermal transmittance 0.30 W/m²K

From the energy performance certificate lodged in November 2017, the latest held for this property. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Redbridge
Application type
Householder
Postcode
IG7 4FU
Received
17 Jul 2026
Validated
17 Jul 2026
Ward
Hainault
Case officer
Show
Target decision
10 Sept 2026
Decision
Granted/Approved - with conditions
Decision date
16 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated C/Signed C. Zhandire
Applicant
Show
Agent
IAN D CUTHBERT

How this decision compares

Decided in 61 days from validation, 31 days slower than Redbridge's median of 30 for extensions. Approved, as 85% of extensions here are.

90%decided within 8 weeks
85%approved
1,460decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Redbridge in the last twelve months, from validation. Redbridge decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15067762
Comments by
11 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
22 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
11 Aug 2026
Redbridge
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#174 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redbridge ranks #129 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Redbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #292 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #267 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #129 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #90 of 296
57%
Minor dwellings approved
152 decided (1-9 homes)
83%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
32%
Change of use approved
192 decided
1,673
Total decisions
461 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.