Land At Prestbury Road Macclesfield, * Data via plota.co.uk

25/0210/OUT - Outline Planning Allowed on appeal

Proposal

Outline planning permission (with all matters reserved except site access) for residential development (Use Class C3) comprising of new dwellings, public open space, hard and soft landscaping, and associated infrastructure and works. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Jan 2025
✗
Refused
17 Sept 2025
✓
Appeal allowed

Refused on 17 Sept 2025 · Strategic Planning Board · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Cheshire East Strategic Planning Board on 11 Sept 2025.

Refused

Against officer advice, as the minutes record.

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

  • The application sought outline permission for new homes with public open space and landscaping.
  • A ward councillor, two adjacent ward councillors, two objectors and the applicant's agent spoke about the application.

Source: Plota analysis of Cheshire East's committee minutes, Cheshire East Strategic Planning Board minutes, 11 September 2025 .

Documents 67

Statements & assessments 37

PDF Transport Statement Supporting Information · 1 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF Planning Statement Addendum Supporting Information · 26 Jun 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG Statutory Metric Supporting Information · 18 Jun 2025 View ↗ PDF Biodiversity Net Gain - Biodiversity Statement Supporting Information · 18 Jun 2025 View ↗ PDF ATC Survey Supporting Information · 5 Feb 2025 View ↗ PDF Planning Statement Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Transport Assessment Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Transport Assessment Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Heritage Statement Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Design and Access Statement Part 2 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Design and Access Statement Part 1 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Health Impact Assessment Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG Biodiversity Statement Part 2 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Agricultural Land Assessment Part 2 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Agricultural Land Assessment Part 1 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG Biodiversity Statement Part 3 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG Biodiversity Statement Part 1 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Statement of Community Engagement Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Housing Mix Statement Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Economic Benefits Summary Statement Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF National Vegetation Classification Survey Part 1 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Ecological Impact Assessment Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF National Vegetation Classification Survey Part 1 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural Impact Assessment and Method Statement Part 2 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural Impact Assessment and Method Statement Part 1 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Drainage Management Strategy 3 of 3 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Drainage Management Strategy 2 of 3 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Drainage Management Strategy 1 of 3 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Flood Risk Assessment 3 of 3 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Flood Risk Assessment 2 of 3 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Flood Risk Assessment 1 of 3 Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Biodiversity Metric Calculation Tool Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Energy Statement Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Playing Pitch and Outdoor Sport Needs Assessment Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Ecological Enhancement Plan Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Air Quality Assessment Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗ PDF Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Supporting Information · 21 Jan 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: Merseyside and Greater Manchester
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Local nature reserve 346 m away: Riverside Park, Macclesfield.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Cheshire East - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Outline Planning
Received
21 Jan 2025
Validated
21 Jan 2025
Ward
Broken Cross and Upton
Parish
Macclesfield
Case officer
Show
Target decision
17 Sept 2025
Decision
Refused
Decision date
17 Sept 2025
Decision level
Strategic Planning Board
Applicant
Show
Agent
Turley

How this decision compares

Decided in 239 days from validation, 90 days slower than Cheshire East's median of 149 for new homes. Approved, as 69% of new homes here are.

16%decided within 8 weeks
69%approved
14%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Cheshire East in the last twelve months, from validation. Cheshire East decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
13 Jul 2025
Statutory expiry
17 Sept 2025
Cheshire East
Planning Authority Score
1.9/10
Poor
#274 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Cheshire East is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #268 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 65% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cheshire East decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #168 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #170 of 296
39%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #268 of 296
65%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #279 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
358 decided (1-9 homes)
76%
Major dwellings approved
25 decided (10+ homes)
79%
Change of use approved
119 decided
2,513
Total decisions
321 refused in the year to March 2026