Land To The West Of Lyndhurst Nurseries Windlestone DL17 0RF Data via plota.co.uk

DM/26/00024/FPA - Full Planning Application Pending Consideration

Proposal

Hybrid application comprising full planning permission for 148no. Dwellings with associated SuDS and landscaping; and outline planning permission with all matters reserved for the development of up to 320no. Dwellings with associated SuDS and landscaping Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
20 Jan 2026
✓
Consultation
23 Mar 2026
Decision
Expected by 21 Apr 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 13 Apr 2026; it is now day 262.

The consultation period closed on 13 Apr 2026.

Documents 63

Statements & assessments 23

PDF ECOLOGY Consultee Comment · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT REVISION 1 Amended Report · 20 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PHASE 1 GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF MINERAL SAFEGUARDING ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT V1 - LAND NORTH OF A689 CHILTON Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF THE STATUTORY BIODIVERSITY METRIC Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF STATUTORY BIODIVERSITY METRIC Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PLANNING MEETING HOUSING NEEDS AND OPEN SPACE STATEMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL AND BASELINE BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LANDSCAPE & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF NOISE ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF ENERGY STATEMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PHASE 1 GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF ODOUR RISK ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL AND BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND METHOD STATEMENT Supporting Information · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗

Consultation & comments 27

PDF DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS (FEB 2026 UPDATED) Consultee Comment · 8 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF HIGHWAY COMMENTS (LOCAL ROAD NETWORK) Consultee Comment · 28 May 2026 View ↗ PDF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CHILTON TOWN COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 20 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 12 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF NORTHUMBRIAN WATER Consultee Comment · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF DCC ACTIVE TRAVEL Consultee Comment · 2 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 18 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF LANDSCAPE COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF LLFA - SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Consultee Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ACTIVE TRAVEL ENGLAND Consultee Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS 1 OF 3 FORMAL POSITION Consultee Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS 2 OF 3 COVER LETTER Consultee Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS 3 OF 3 TECHNICAL MEMO Consultee Comment · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ARCHAEOLOGY Consultee Comment · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF AFFORDABLE HOUSING Consultee Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF POLICE ARCHITECTURAL LIAISON OFFICER (PALO) Consultee Comment · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF HSE DOES NOT ADVISE AGAINST Consultee Comment · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF HSE HAS AN INTEREST Consultee Comment · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF NATURAL ENGLAND GENERAL ADVICE Consultee Comment · 28 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF NATURAL ENGLAND Consultee Comment · 28 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF TREES OFFICER Consultee Comment · 22 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF THE COAL AUTHORITY Consultee Comment · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF NHS Consultee Comment · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF EDUCATION Consultee Comment · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF NHS Consultee Comment · 20 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF SABIC Consultee Comment · 20 Jan 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Durham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Durham
Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
DL17 0RF
Received
6 Jan 2026
Validated
20 Jan 2026
Ward
Chilton
Parish
Chilton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 Apr 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Hedley Planning Services

Decision outlook

Day 262, past the statutory target. 76% of new homes in Durham are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 2 Oct 2026.

Day 262171 days past the 91-day target
54%decided within 8 weeks
70%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Durham in the last twelve months, from validation. Durham decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

416 neighbours consulted · Last counted 2 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14543587
Planning Portal ref
PP-14543587
Neighbours
21 Jan 2026
Consultation
23 Mar 2026
Comments by
13 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
23 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
21 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Durham
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#137 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Durham ranks #190 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Durham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #52 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #29 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #190 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #213 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
95 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
49 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
201 decided
1,706
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026