Land To The South Of Burleigh Lane Crawley Down West Sussex Data via plota.co.uk

DM/25/3191 - Outline Application Refused

Proposal

Outline application with all matters reserved except for access from Burleigh Lane, for the erection of up to eight self-build/custom build dwellings, drainage and ancillary works. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
15 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
23 Dec 2025
✗
Refused
2 Jun 2026
Appeal
Appeal in Progress

Refused on 2 Jun 2026 · Planning Committee · Last checked 3 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Mid Sussex Planning Committee on 21 May 2026.

Refused unanimously

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised approval because the benefits were not significantly outweighed by harm, subject to conditions and a legal agreement.
  • Residents and consultees raised concerns about countryside character, heritage, traffic, infrastructure, drainage and construction disruption.
  • Members unanimously refused permission, citing cumulative countryside harm and effects on the Sussex Border Path and its users.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site context, officer advice, objections, committee debate, vote and reasons for refusal. Includes the meeting recording, from 0:24:18 where this application was taken

Source: Plota analysis of Mid Sussex's committee minutes of 21 May 2026.

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat about 19 m away: Good quality semi improved grassland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Mid Sussex - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Mid Sussex
Application type
Outline Application
Received
15 Dec 2025
Validated
23 Dec 2025
Ward
Crawley Down
Parish
Worth
Case officer
Show
Target decision
17 Feb 2026
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
2 Jun 2026
Decision level
Planning Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 161 days from validation, 94 days slower than Mid Sussex's median of 67 for outline applications. Refused, as 41% of outline applications here are.

41%decided within 8 weeks
59%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for outline applications decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent outline applications in Mid Sussex to go on. Mid Sussex decision record →

Public comments

30comments received
30 objecting

100% object · above the UK average of 74%

38 neighbours consulted · Last counted 3 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14170546
Planning Portal ref
PP-14170546
Comments by
6 Feb 2026
Committee
21 May 2026
Statutory expiry
17 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
Mid Sussex
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#161 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Mid Sussex ranks #150 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Mid Sussex decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #87 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #132 of 296
64%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #150 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #179 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
83 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
33 decided
1,115
Total decisions
93 refused in the year to March 2026