6 Omega Court, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 3XR Data via plota.co.uk

CB/26/00220/FULL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Single storey wrap around extension with rooflights Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
23 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
30 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
22 Jun 2026

Approved on 22 Jun 2026 · Last checked 13 Oct 2026

Site constraints 3

Also on the record
Inside the Leighton Buzzard built-up area; National infrastructure project about 1413 m away: The Grand Union Canal Transfer, at pre-application; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 2

Last sold for £165,500 in July 2004. Semi-detached house, freehold.

29 July 2004£165,500
26 January 1996£55,000

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
LU7 3XR
Received
23 Jan 2026
Validated
30 Apr 2026
Parish
Leighton-Linslade
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 Jun 2026
Decision
Full Application - Granted Conditions or Reasons: View Conditions or Reasons Informative Notes: 1 )The application site is 6 Omega Court, Leighton Buzzard and is situated along Omega Court. The host dwelling is a semi-detached dwelling and is surrounded by dwellings that are similar in scale and design. The proposed development would include the erection of single storey side and rear extension to form a wraparound extension. Rooflights are proposed to the rear roofslope of the extension. With regards to character and appearance, the proposed single storey side extension would be visible along Omega Court, whilst the rear extension would not be visible along Omega Court given its siting to the rear of the host dwelling, it would be visible from the play area located to the rear of the site. Having regard to the siting, scale and design of the proposal, it is considered that the extension would form an appropriate addition to the application site. The proposed extension would be finished in materials to match the architectural features of the host dwelling. Therefore, the proposal would not detract away from the existing external finish of the host dwelling. As such, the proposed development would not be considered to result in a harmful impact to the host dwelling or to the character and appearance of the area. In terms of impact on neighbouring amenity, the proposal would be marginally set off the shared boundary with neighbouring properties: 7, 8 and 9 Omega Court (located to the east of the application site) and there would be a further separation distance from the nearest built form of these neighbours. Therefore, the proposal would not give rise to a detrimental harm to the amenities of the occupants at these properties. In terms of No. 5 Omega Court, the proposed single storey rear element of the proposal would be sited immediately adjacent to the shared boundary of this neighbour. The rear extension would protrude some 2.1 metres beyond No. 5 rear built form. No. 5 has a window and doors to the rear. The proposal would result in a minor loss of light to the rear fenestration of No. 5. Whilst the proposal cannot be implemented under permitted development given it forms a wraparound addition to the host dwelling, projections of 3 metres along a shared boundary under permitted development are commonplace. Having regard to the above, it is considered on balance that the proposal would not result in a detrimental overbearingness or loss of light to No. 5. The application site is located within the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC). However, as no additional residential units are proposed, the proposal is not considered to have a detrimental impact upon the SAC. It is therefore considered that the proposal as a whole would not result in any material impact on the residential amenities of any neighbouring properties and would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the area. The proposal is therefore considered to be in conformity with Policy HQ1 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan (CBLP). With regards to parking, on the basis of the scale and nature of the development, adequate parking has been retained. The development does not create any additional bedrooms and as such will not be required to demonstrate further onsite parking. The application was subject to public consultation and no representation were received. Leighton-Linslade Town Council were consulted on the application and raised no objection to the proposal. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2, T3 of the CBLP (2021), Section 11 of the Central Bedfordshire Design Guide (2023) and Section 12 of the NPPF.The application site is 6 Omega Court, Leighton Buzzard and is situated along Omega Court. The host dwelling is a semi-detached dwelling and is surrounded by dwellings that are similar in scale and design. The proposed development would include the erection of single storey side and rear extension to form a wraparound extension. Rooflights are proposed to the rear roofslope of the extension. With regards to character and appearance, the proposed single storey side extension would be visible along Omega Court, whilst the rear extension would not be visible along Omega Court given its siting to the rear of the host dwelling, it would be visible from the play area located to the rear of the site. Having regard to the siting, scale and design of the proposal, it is considered that the extension would form an appropriate addition to the application site. The proposed extension would be finished in materials to match the architectural features of the host dwelling. Therefore, the proposal would not detract away from the existing external finish of the host dwelling. As such, the proposed development would not be considered to result in a harmful impact to the host dwelling or to the character and appearance of the area. In terms of impact on neighbouring amenity, the proposal would be marginally set off the shared boundary with neighbouring properties: 7, 8 and 9 Omega Court (located to the east of the application site) and there would be a further separation distance from the nearest built form of these neighbours. Therefore, the proposal would not give rise to a detrimental harm to the amenities of the occupants at these properties. In terms of No. 5 Omega Court, the proposed single storey rear element of the proposal would be sited immediately adjacent to the shared boundary of this neighbour. The rear extension would protrude some 2.1 metres beyond No. 5 rear built form. No. 5 has a window and doors to the rear. The proposal would result in a minor loss of light to the rear fenestration of No. 5. Whilst the proposal cannot be implemented under permitted development given it forms a wraparound addition to the host dwelling, projections of 3 metres along a shared boundary under permitted development are commonplace. Having regard to the above, it is considered on balance that the proposal would not result in a detrimental overbearingness or loss of light to No. 5. The application site is located within the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC). However, as no additional residential units are proposed, the proposal is not considered to have a detrimental impact upon the SAC. It is therefore considered that the proposal as a whole would not result in any material impact on the residential amenities of any neighbouring properties and would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the area. The proposal is therefore considered to be in conformity with Policy HQ1 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan (CBLP). With regards to parking, on the basis of the scale and nature of the development, adequate parking has been retained. The development does not create any additional bedrooms and as such will not be required to demonstrate further onsite parking. The application was subject to public consultation and no representation were received. Leighton-Linslade Town Council were consulted on the application and raised no objection to the proposal. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2, T3 of the CBLP (2021), Section 11 of the Central Bedfordshire Design Guide (2023) and Section 12 of the NPPF. 2 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications. 3 )The site is located within the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC). Natural England have not provided any comments on this application, however, as no additional independent overnight accommodation is proposed, the proposal is not considered to have a detrimental impact upon the SAC.The site is located within the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC). Natural England have not provided any comments on this application, however, as no additional independent overnight accommodation is proposed, the proposal is not considered to have a detrimental impact upon the SAC. 4 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 5 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. 6 )Will a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bandsWill a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bands 7 )Please note that the unnumbered drawings submitted in connection with this application have been given unique numbers by the Local Planning Authority. The numbers can be sourced by examining the plans on the View a Planning Application pages of the Councils website www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk.Please note that the unnumbered drawings submitted in connection with this application have been given unique numbers by the Local Planning Authority. The numbers can be sourced by examining the plans on the View a Planning Application pages of the Councils website www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk.
Decision date
22 Jun 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 53 days from validation, about the council's usual 54 days. Approved, as 90% of extensions here are.

77%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
100%go to committee

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Central Bedfordshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Central Bedfordshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 13 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
30 Apr 2026
Comments by
11 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
21 May 2026
Central Bedfordshire
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#88 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Central Bedfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #218 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #169 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #62 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #99 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
153 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
29 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
45 decided
1,444
Total decisions
226 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.