3-5 Part Ground Floor,Putney Bridge Approach,London,Hammersmith And Fulham,SW6 3JD Data via plota.co.uk

P/2026/01696/FUL - Full Planning Application REGISTERED: Under Assessment

Proposal

Partial demolition of the ground floor (entrance and reception pavilion area) and erection of a replacement single-storey extension to form part of entrance and reception pavilion; replacement of 7no existing blocked up windows with new aluminium framed windows to northern elevation of the main building at ground floor level; replacement, alterations and installation of new boundary treatments; associated external landscaping and other associated works. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
18 Aug 2026
Decision
Target date was 13 Oct 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 1 Nov 2026 and 11 Nov 2026, from Hammersmith and Fulham's recent demolitions.

The consultation period closed on 16 Sept 2026.

Documents 48

Plans & drawings 41

PDF REVISED PROPOSED SITE PLAN Revised · 16 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF REVISED PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN Revised · 16 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF REVISED PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION Revised · 16 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF REVISED PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Revised · 16 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF REVISED PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) Revised · 16 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF REVISED PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) Revised · 17 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) REVISED PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) Revised · 17 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) Proposed Drawings · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION Proposed Drawings · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) Proposed Drawings · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Proposed Drawings · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Proposed Drawings · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING GF PLAN Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN (DEMOLITION) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING GF PLAN (WITH RECEPTION ROOF) (DEMOLITION) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED FF PLAN (A2983-PL-202) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING WEST ELEVATION (DEMOLITION) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION (DEMOLITION) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) (DEMOLITION) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION (COURTYARD) (DEMOLITION) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (A2983-PL-401A) Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) A2983-PL-402 Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION A2983-PL-403 Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) A2983-PL-404 Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) A2983-PL-405 Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF A2983-PL-406 Drawing · 17 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (A2983-PL-401) Proposed Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION (A2983-PL-400) Proposed Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION Existing Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING WEST ELEVATION Existing Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED GF PLAN Proposed Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING GF PLAN Existing Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN (A2983-PL-020) Drawing · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING BLOCK PLAN Existing Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF LOCATION PLAN Drawing · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION (A2983-PL-400) Proposed Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) PROPOSED GF PLAN Proposed Drawings · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF (SUPERSEDED) PROPOSED SITE PLAN (A2983-PL-020) Drawing · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 12

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
National infrastructure project: Thames Tideway Tunnel
The site is inside the project boundary. Waste water treatment, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Archaeological priority area: Main settlement of the parish from Saxon times onwards.
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Hammersmith and Fulham AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Registered park or garden 61 m away: Bishop's Park
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Conservation area 19 m away: Putney Bridge
The edge of the area; work outside it can still affect its setting.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Also on the record
Scheduled monument 164 m away: Fulham Palace moated site; Inside the Hammersmith and Fulham built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 6a (excellent), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Flood defence 36 m away (wall, designed for a 1 in 1000 year flood); Metropolitan Open Land 64 m away.
Not affected
Not green belt

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Hammersmith and Fulham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
SW6 3JD
Received
3 Jul 2026
Validated
18 Aug 2026
Ward
Palace And Hurlingham
Case officer
Show
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 72 of the 56-day target. Hammersmith and Fulham usually decides demolitions by day 79.

Day 727 days to the predicted decision (day 79)
17%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
49decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Hammersmith and Fulham in the last twelve months, from validation. Hammersmith and Fulham decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
18 Aug 2026
Comments by
16 Sept 2026
Site or press notice
26 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
13 Oct 2026
Hammersmith and Fulham
Planning Authority Score
3.7/10
Below average
#210 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Hammersmith and Fulham is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #281 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 63% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 99% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Hammersmith and Fulham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #20 of 296
99%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #4 of 296
33%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #281 of 296
63%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #275 of 296
97%
Minor dwellings approved
209 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
1 decided (10+ homes)
92%
Change of use approved
37 decided
1,321
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026