Replacement windows at 43 Brunswick Street, Royal Leamington Spa

Summary of planning committee decision

Deferred by Warwick Planning Committee on 16 Sept 2026.

W/26/0364/LBDeferred

What was proposed

The applicant sought listed building consent to replace front and rear windows with timber units using vacuum or slimline double glazing.

“43 Brunswick Street, Royal Leamington Spa Replacement of windows to the front and rear elevations, with specific windows comprising of timber units with vacuum double glazing proposed to the front elevation and timber units with 12mm slimline double glazing to the rear elevation. FOR Gee Bee Investments Ltd ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------”

“This application is being presented to Committee due to the number of support comments received as it is recommended for refusal. RECOMMENDATION Planning Committee is recommended to refuse listed building consent for the reasons set out at the end of the report.”

Officer report

The building and its history

The site is a Grade II listed detached villa, with earlier consent for basement conversion, windows, a door and a rear extension.

“THE SITE AND ITS LOCATION The application site relates to a two-storey Grade II listed, detached villa, dating from 1818-1828 with later alterations. The villa is within the setting of the neighbouring Grade II-listed terrace of Nos 45-51 but is not located within a Conservation Area. The villa is comprised of pinkish-brown brick with a painted stucco front façade and Welsh slate roof, with a full height canted bay to the right of the front elevation.”

“PLANNING HISTORY W/02/1525 & W/02/1526/LB – Conversion of basement to residential unit and insertion of windows and door. Erection of two-storey rear extension - Granted RELEVANT POLICIES”

Officer report

Why officers recommended refusal

Officers considered the front windows’ bulk, design and manufactured appearance harmful to the listed building, and greater than the energy-efficiency benefits.

“Balancing Exercise In accordance with the NPPF 2026, substantial weight is given to the energy efficiency benefits of the proposals which are to be balanced with the substantial weight also to be given to the conservation of the Listed Building in a manner appropriate to its significance and the harm arising to the significance of the Listed Building from the proposals.”

Officer report

What people said

The town council made no comments, while eight public comments supported the proposal because of energy efficiency, lower heating costs and EPC requirements.

“Royal Leamington Spa Town Council - No comments made.”

“Reasons listed include improved energy efficiency, reduced heating costs and meeting EPC requirements.”

Officer report

What happened at committee

Members considered the officers’ heritage assessment and a further objection from Leamington Society before a deferral proposal was made and seconded.

“That harm arising from the bulk, design, and manufactured appearance of the proposed windows when considered relative to the fine glazing bars and textured glazing of the historic glazing previously present at the property…”

“An Addendum circulated prior to the meeting advised of a further objection representation from Leamington Society.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The application was deferred so officers could provide evidence on earlier decisions and appeals, explain the updated NPPF and comment technically on reflective glazing.

“Following consideration of the report, presentation, and information contained in the Addendum, it was proposed by Councillor Boad and seconded by Councillor Phillips that the application should be deferred.”

“Resolved W/26/0364 LB be deferred, to enable officers to prepare a fully detailed report that provides factual evidence on previous relevant decisions and appeals, offers clarity on the application of the updated NPPF, and includes further technical commentary on the reflective qualities of the proposed glazing.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Warwick Planning Committee minutes, 16 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Warwick's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Warwick
Date
Wednesday 16 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Deferred
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

42 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →