Wentworth Woodhouse Wentworth Park Cortworth Lane Wentworth 9999 Data via plota.co.uk

RB2025/1517 Approved

Proposal

Application to vary condition 1 (to allow continued use of site for public use, including tours, workshops, educational uses, as well as cafes and restaurants and other ancillary uses & infrastructure until 31st December 2028) & Variation of Condition 27 (electric vehicle charging point provision) imposed by Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 Nov 2025
✓
Approved
4 Jun 2026

Approved on 4 Jun 2026 · Proposed to be Delegated · Last checked 14 Oct 2026

Documents 1

Decision & officer reports 1

PDF Decision Notice Document · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

Surface water flood risk
Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Registered park or garden: Wentworth Woodhouse
Nationally designated heritage. Its significance and setting carry great weight.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Public footpath about 16 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Surface water flood riskCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
2 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rotherham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

24 Sept 2026Pending

Wentworth Park, Stable Block Cortworth Lane Wentworth

Application to vary condition 2 (approved plans) imposed by RB2022/1093

RB2026/1352
18 Aug 2026Approved

Wentworth Park Wentworth Woodhouse Cortworth Lane Wentworth 9999

Discharge of condition 03 imposed by planning application RB2025/1662

RB2026/1151
11 Aug 2026Approved

Wentworth Park, Wentworth Woodhouse Cortworth LaneWentworth 9999

Change of use for second floor of South Pavilion & South Quadrant to holiday let...

RB2026/0849

Important details

Council
Rotherham
Received
20 Nov 2025
Validated
20 Nov 2025
Ward
Hoober Ward
Parish
Wentworth
Case officer
Show
Decision
GRANTED CONDITIONALLY
Decision date
4 Jun 2026
Decision level
Proposed to be Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Stephenson Halliday

How this decision compares

Decided in 196 days from validation, 176 days slower than Rotherham's median of 20 for amendments. Approved, as 93% of amendments here are.

91%decided within 8 weeks
93%approved
55decided in the last year

Plota live figures for amendments decided by Rotherham in the last twelve months, from validation. Rotherham decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
20 Nov 2025
Comments by
18 Dec 2025
Site or press notice
27 Nov 2025
Statutory expiry
5 Jun 2026
Rotherham
Planning Authority Score
4.7/10
Below average
#167 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rotherham ranks #107 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Rotherham is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 71% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 71% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rotherham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
79%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #266 of 296
71%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #295 of 296
72%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #107 of 296
32%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #68 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
63 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
58 decided
750
Total decisions
156 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings