Land To The South Of Stortford Road Little Canfield Essex CM6 1SN Data via plota.co.uk

UTT/26/1629/DOC - Discharge of Conditions Decided

Proposal

Discharge of conditions 4 (Written Scheme of Investigation), 9 (materials) and 10 (landscaping) attached to Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
1 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
6 Jul 2026
✓
Discharge Conditions in Part
31 Jul 2026

Discharge Conditions in Part on 31 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Aug 2026

Associated applications 6

Site constraints 5

Local nature reserve 61 m away: Flitch Way
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
SSSI 452 m away: High Wood, Dunmow SSSI; 1 listed building within 150 m.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Uttlesford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Uttlesford
Application type
Discharge of Conditions
Postcode
CM6 1SN
Received
1 Jul 2026
Validated
1 Jul 2026
Ward
Takeley
Parish
Little Canfield
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 Aug 2026
Decision
Discharge Conditions in Part
Decision date
31 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
KHA Design LTD

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 6 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15039504
Planning Portal ref
PP-15039504
Consultation
6 Jul 2026
Comments by
27 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
26 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Uttlesford
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#95 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Uttlesford is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #31 out of 296. Only 25% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Uttlesford is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Uttlesford decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #280 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #272 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #31 of 296
25%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #33 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
276 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
28 decided
1,247
Total decisions
288 refused in the year to March 2026