Weyside Urban Village (Slyfield regeneration Programme), Slyfield Green, Guildford, GU1 Data via plota.co.uk

20/P/02155/S106/1 - Appl. to Discharge or Modify Section 106 Registered

Proposal

Deed of variation to the Section 106 dated 20 March 2022 to vary the definition of the Commencement of Development to allow the undertaking of works relating to the Sustainable Movement Corridor without triggering the requirement for these obligations, to correct an obligation relating to the phasing of when the SANG NMU Connection would be provided by changing the Phase number withing Schedule 5 Paragraph 2.6 to relate to residential Phase 2, within Schedule 5, to amend the trigger to deliver the Bus Service Phasing Plan to relate specifically to the commencement of any dwelling instead of a strict pre-commencement trigger, and within Schedule 5, to amend the trigger to Paragraph 14.1 to allow for the occupation of 270 dwellings before the requirement for the obligations within Paragraphs 14.1.1 and 14.1.2 are necessary. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Jul 2025
✓
Consultation
25 Jul 2025
Decision
Target date was 5 Sept 2025

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 5 Sept 2025.

The consultation period closed on 16 Aug 2025.

Site constraints 7

Public footpath about 4 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Priority habitat: Deciduous woodland
A habitat of principal importance. It shapes the ecology work and the biodiversity net gain a scheme has to show.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Local nature reserve about 87 m away: Riverside Park
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats -NEX
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Conservation area about 71 m away: Wey and Godalming Navigations; Green belt about 72 m away: London.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Guildford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Guildford
Application type
Appl. to Discharge or Modify Section 106
Received
11 Jul 2025
Validated
11 Jul 2025
Ward
Stoke
Parish
Stoke
Case officer
Show
Target decision
5 Sept 2025
Decision level
Delegated
Agent
Savills

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 23 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
25 Jul 2025
Comments by
16 Aug 2025
Env. assessment
No
Guildford
Planning Authority Score
1/10
Poor
#292 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Guildford is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #282 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 64% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Guildford decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #221 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #243 of 296
31%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #282 of 296
64%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #276 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
6 decided (10+ homes)
66%
Change of use approved
47 decided
1,348
Total decisions
219 refused in the year to March 2026