3G synthetic football pitch at Pilgrim Foodservice, Forge Lane, Thornhill Lees, Dewsbury

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Kirklees Planning Committee on 5 Aug 2026.

2026/90271Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed replacing a grass pitch with a full-size 3G synthetic pitch, floodlighting, drainage, fencing, parking and bus bays.

“The application relates to a site within the existing “Football Park” also known as Mountblow Pitches on Lilac Avenue in Clydebank. Mountblow Pitches has a range of existing sports facilities including 1 synthetic pitch which can be utilised as either one 11 a-side pitch or three 7 a-side pitches, as well as 1 grass football pitch. There is also a sports pavilion which is a Category C listed building.”

“The replacement of the existing grass pitch with a full-size 3G synthetic pitch measuring 106m by 66m with a 2m wide hardstanding area and access path. • The erection of a 6-column LED floodlighting system measuring 15m in height. • Drainage works. • The erection of perimeter fencing measuring 3m in height and extending to 5m in heigh behind the goal ends. • The erection of 4m high, solid acoustic fencing at the east goal end.”

Officer report

Earlier application

An earlier application for a similar 3G pitch was withdrawn at the applicant’s request and did not include the informal parking area.

“Previous relevant site history includes application DC25/016/FUL for the construction of a new 3G synthetic pitch including drainage, floodlighting and fencing. This application did not include the area currently used as informal parking and was withdrawn at the applicant's request.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Roads, Environmental Health, flooding and Network Rail raised no objections, with conditions sought for lighting, construction, noise, drainage and contamination matters.

“West Dunbartonshire Council Roads Service No objections. It is noted that a swept path analysis for buses shows they can safely enter and manoeuvre within the site without conflict or obstructing the turning area. Acceptable pedestrian routes between parking areas are also provided. Conditions relating to floodlighting and that no materials or plant obstruct the public road or footway during construction are requested.”

“West Dunbartonshire Council Environmental Health Service No objections subject to conditions relating to the hours of operation of the facility including the flood lighting, the acoustic fence, construction hours, vehicle delivery times during construction, contaminated land and dust.”

Officer report

Who spoke

Two objectors addressed the committee, followed by the council’s Greenspace Manager on behalf of the applicant, who answered members’ questions.

Committee discussion

A motion to refuse cited possible negative effects on climate and nature policies, while an amendment proposed granting permission subject to conditions.

“After discussion, Provost Murray Conaghan, seconded by Councillor Pollock, moved that the Committee refuse the planning application citing concerns that the proposed laying of the synthetic 3G pitch contained within this application would have a negative effect in respect of NPF4 Policies 1, 2 and 3.”

“As an amendment Councillor O’Neill, seconded by Councillor Sorrell, moved that the Committee agree to grant planning permission subject to the conditions set out in Section 9 of the report.”

Minutes

The vote

The committee voted five to two for a further amendment to continue the application for additional parking and transport information.

“As a further amendment, Councillor Oxley, seconded by Councillor Dickson, moved that the Committee agree to continue this item to allow for the applicant to provide further information regarding parking and transport matters, including details of current and proposed future use, and agreeing that if the information is not forthcoming that authority is delegated to the Planning, Building Standards and Environmental Health Manager, to provide notice of refusal of the planning…”

“On a vote being taken, 5 Members voted for the amendment and 2 for the motion, the amendment was accordingly declared carried.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Kirklees Planning Committee minutes, 5 August 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Kirklees's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Kirklees
Date
Wednesday 5 August 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

12 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →