City Fields District Centre Land At Neil Fox Way Data via plota.co.uk

Decided 19/00196/NMC06
Admin / procedural
Council
Wakefield 3.6/10
Date received
19 Sept 2025
Date validated
19 Sept 2025

Description

Non-material amendment to the description of development (ref. ) to remove reference to the previously varied conditions and the approved mix of uses so it reads as follows: 'The construction of a mixed-use District Centre with associated access, car parking, landscaping and infrastructure work'; and the insertion of a new planning condition which sets out the approved mix of uses. Data via plota.co.uk

Get alerts nearby Council site ↗

Last checked

Site constraints 3

In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 18 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Wakefield - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

21 Aug 2026Approved

City Fields District Centre Land At Neil Fox Way Wakefield

Discharge of Condition 5 (Highways Retaining Walls and Structures) from approved...

19/00196/SUB11
10 Aug 2026Approved

City Fields District Centre Land At Neil Fox Way Wakefield

Discharge of Condition 4 (Bat and Bird Mitigation Measures) from approved applic...

19/00196/SUB10
3 Aug 2026Approved

2 Holly Cottages Heath Wakefield WF1 5SN

Tree 1 - Mature Magnolia: Crown Reduce by 50%. Tree 2 - Conifer: Fell

26/01361/TPO
Wakefield
Planning Authority Score
3.6/10
Below average
#217 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Wakefield is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #223 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 56% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Wakefield decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #95 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #94 of 296
53%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #223 of 296
56%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #256 of 296
89%
Minor dwellings approved
79 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
24 decided (10+ homes)
85%
Change of use approved
74 decided
1,084
Total decisions
88 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings