Greetham Valley Lodges Wood Lane Greetham Rutland Data via plota.co.uk

2025/0831/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Extension of Clubhouse and associated alterations to provide an indoor swimming pool and spa; associated remodelling of 10th tee incorporating gabion retaining wall; erection of pergola over terrace; creation of covered open walkway; and erection of 3 padel courts with fencing, canopy and floodlighting on site of existing bowling green. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
7 Jul 2025
✓
Appeal allowed
4 Feb 2026
✓
Consultation
8 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
5 May 2026

Approved on 5 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 15 Oct 2026

Documents 57

Statements & assessments 26

PDF EMAILS - BNG CONDITION Correspondence · 5 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF APPLICANTS ECOLOGIST - INFO Correspondence · 14 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 31 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 26 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF V4 BNG METRIC TOOL - REVISED BNG · 22 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 9 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF V4 BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN ASSESSMENT - REVISED Revised Document · 15 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF V4 BNG METRIC TOOL - REVISED Drawing Superceded · 15 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 28 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF EOT AGREEMENT, AND DIFFERENCE OF OPINION OF LEGAL AGREEMENT FOR BNG Correspondence · 14 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF EMAILS - BNG ENHANCEMENTS AND S106 AGREEMENT Correspondence · 13 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 8 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF BIODIVERSITY METRIC CALCULATION TOOL Superseded Document · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF GOVERNMENT GUIDANCE - SIGNIFICANT ON-SITE ENHANCEMENTS FOR BNG Supporting Document · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG TECHNICAL GUIDE BNG · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN ASSESSMENT BNG · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG PART 1 & 2 HIGH LEIGH GOLF CLUB BNG · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF EMAILS - BNG COMPENSATION Correspondence · 5 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF AGENT RESPONSE TO ECOLOGY COMMENTS Correspondence · 6 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 4 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF BIODIVERSITY GAIN ASSESSMENT Superseded Document · 7 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF BASELINE ONSITE HABITAT SURVEY REPORT (BAT ROOST ASSESSMENT) Supporting Document · 7 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY METRIC CALCULATION TOOL Superseded Document · 7 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF PLANNING & D&A STATEMENT Supporting Document · 7 Jul 2025 View ↗

Consultation & comments 11

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 12 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 24 Jul 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 17 Jul 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 15 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rutland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rutland
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
LE15 7SN
Received
7 Jul 2025
Validated
7 Jul 2025
Ward
Greetham Ward
Parish
Greetham Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
5 May 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
5 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Appeal
Allowed · 4 Feb 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 6001876 ↗
Applicant
Show
Agent
Hancock Town Planning Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 302 days from validation, 246 days slower than Rutland's median of 56 for full applications. Approved, as 87% of full applications here are.

64%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
332decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Rutland in the last twelve months, from validation. Rutland decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 15 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14138091
Planning Portal ref
PP-14138091
Consultation
8 Apr 2026
Comments by
22 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
8 Aug 2025
Statutory expiry
1 Sept 2025
Env. assessment
No
Rutland
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#93 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rutland is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #87 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rutland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #142 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #164 of 296
74%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #87 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #91 of 296
65%
Minor dwellings approved
43 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
24 decided
520
Total decisions
57 refused in the year to March 2026