Rear and side extensions at 31 Wanderdown Road, Brighton

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Brighton And Hove Planning Committee on 4 Jun 2025.

BH2025/00150Approved

What was proposed

The application sought single-storey rear and side extensions, an enlarged front porch with canopy, and a larger patio.

“Planning permission is sought for single-storey rear and side extensions and an extended front porch with a new canopy and larger patio.”

“During the course of determining the application, the proposal was amended to remove the proposed loft conversion and raising of the roof ridge.”

Officer report

The site

The site is a detached brick and tile bungalow among mainly bungalows on Wanderdown Road, outside a conservation area.

“The application site relates to a detached bungalow of brick and tile construction with rendered elements on the northeast side of Wanderdown Road in Ovingdean. The road comprises mainly bungalows, with some houses, of varying architectural styles.”

“The site is not within a conservation area and there are no Article 4 Directions covering the site relating to extensions or alterations.”

Officer report

Earlier advice

Earlier advice raised concern about the loft conversion and higher roof ridge, while finding the other proposals broadly acceptable with design changes.

“OFFRPT 3.1. PRE2024/00163 Extended front patio extended front porch, rear single-storey extensions, loft alterations/conversion including higher ridge, new windows, roof lights and doors associated with the proposed alterations/extensions. Advice given: Concern regarding increase in ridge height of loft conversion, other proposals likely to be broadly acceptable - design revisions recommended.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the amended extensions were considered acceptable in design, streetscene impact and neighbouring amenity terms.

“Although the proposed additions would result in the majority of the property having a crown roof design, the extensions would be no higher than the existing roof of the property and would not cause harm. The extensions would be towards the rear of the dwelling and would not be readily visible from the public domain so would have no significant impact on the streetscene or character of the area.”

“Conclusion and Planning Balance: 9.17. The revised scheme (with omitted loft conversion/higher ridge) is considered to be acceptable in design and in terms of its impact on neighbouring amenity, in compliance with policy, and approval is recommended.”

Officer report

Public views

Ten letters objected to the earlier proposal, two supported it, and later consultation included withdrawn objections and further support.

“Two (2) letters have been received in support of the proposed development on the following grounds: • Enhances the property • No impact…”

“Note: Five (5) letters have been received in the re-consultation period, two from previous objectors which have now withdrawn their objections, two from previous supporters and one new supporter. It should be noted that a number of the objections received relate to elements of the design which have since been removed such as the loft conversion and raising of the ridge.”

Officer report

Permission conditions

Permission included approved drawings, a three-year commencement limit, a bee brick, and matching external finishes.

“Conditions: 1. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved drawings listed below. Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. Plan Type Reference Version Date Received Location Plan 0564-24-07 20-Jan-25 Block Plan 0564-24-08 B 15-Apr-25 Proposed Drawing 0564-24-10 B 15-Apr-25 Proposed Drawing 0564-24-11 B 15-Apr-25 Proposed Drawing 0564-24-12 B 15-Apr-25”

“A bee brick shall be incorporated within the external wall of the development hereby approved and shall be retained thereafter. Reason: To enhance the biodiversity of the site and to comply with Policy CP10 of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part One, DM37 of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part Two and SPD11 Nature Conservation and Development.”

Officer report

Committee decision

The committee did not call the application for discussion and unanimously agreed the officer recommendation to grant planning permission.

“This application was not called for discussion. The officer recommendation was therefore taken as having been agreed unanimously.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Brighton And Hove Planning Committee minutes, 4 June 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Brighton And Hove's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 4 June 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

15 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →