Plot 5 Land South Of Seabank Chalet Site Spittal Northumberland Data via plota.co.uk

26/02519/DISCON - Discharge of Condition Registered

Proposal

Discharge of conditions 4 (biodiversity net gain), 5 (car parking details), 6 (vehicular access), 7 (cycle parking), 8 (construction method statement), 9 (refuse storage) and 10 (CEMP) on approved application Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
5 Aug 2026
✓
Consultation
10 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 12 Oct 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 12 Oct 2026. The consultation period closed on 1 Oct 2026.

Site constraints 8

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Lindisfarne SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Priority habitat: Maritime cliff and slope
A habitat of principal importance. It shapes the ecology work and the biodiversity net gain a scheme has to show.
Ramsar wetland 63 m away: Lindisfarne
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
SSSI 63 m away: Lindisfarne SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Maritime cliff and slope
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Conservation area 25 m away: Spittal; Heritage at risk 25 m away: Spittal.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 25 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Northumberland (County) - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Discharge of Condition
Received
17 Jul 2026
Validated
5 Aug 2026
Ward
Berwick East
Parish
Berwick-upon-Tweed
Case officer
Show
Target decision
12 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Hodgson + White Ltd

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 3 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15055416
Consultation
10 Sept 2026
Comments by
1 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
31 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Northumberland (County)
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#207 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Northumberland (County) ranks #167 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 47% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Northumberland (County) decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #158 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #178 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #167 of 296
47%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #210 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
223 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
36 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
71 decided
2,013
Total decisions
233 refused in the year to March 2026