46 Russell Drive, Ampthill, Bedford, MK45 2TX Data via plota.co.uk

CB/26/02536/FULL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Demolition of existing conservatory and erection of single storey rear extension and single storey side extension with a rooflight. Erection of porch canopy and alterations to fenestration. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
18 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
9 Oct 2026

Approved on 9 Oct 2026 · Last checked 18 Oct 2026

Site constraints 1

Also on the record
Inside the Ampthill built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 2

Last sold for £295,000 in June 2015. Detached house, freehold.

17 June 2015£295,000
23 June 1995£69,500

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Building

Floor area76 m² (818 sq ft)
Energy ratingD (67 out of 100), could reach C
PropertyDetached bungalow, 3 habitable rooms
Built1967 to 1975
HeatingBoiler and radiators, mains gas
WallsCavity wall, filled cavity

From the energy performance certificate lodged in July 2026, the latest held for this property, matched to this application by its address. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
MK45 2TX
Received
17 Aug 2026
Validated
18 Aug 2026
Parish
Ampthill
Case officer
Show
Target decision
13 Oct 2026
Decision
Full Application - Granted Conditions or Reasons: View Conditions or Reasons Informative Notes: 1 )Reasons for Granting: The application site comprises a detached, bungalow located on the west side of Russell Drive, Ampthill. No. 46 is constructed of brickwork featuring white render and a tiled gable roof. The property currently benefits from a conservatory to the west elevation and a single, detached garage to the north. The proposal seeks planning permission for the demolition of existing conservatory and the erection of a single storey rear extension, a single-storey side extension with a rooflight, a porch canopy and alterations to fenestration. The proposed rear extension would have a maximum depth of 2.5 metres, a width of 11.2 metres and a maximum flat roof height to 2.9 metres. To the west elevation, the proposed side extension would have a maximum depth of 7.1 metres, a width of 4.1 and a maximum flat roof height to 3.2 metres. Russell Drive is characterised by detached bungalows of similar age and design. Rear and side additions to other properties across the streetscene are noted, as such the works are not considered to be at odds with the existing pattern or grain of development. The property remains set back from Russell Drive, with the proposed additions largely retained to the rear of the site, and as such the works would not be readily visible within the streetscene. The proposed addition to the west would sit partially within the footprint of the existing conservatory and all other development would be sited on areas of existing hardstanding. The proposals would remain subservient additions to the host dwelling, constructed of materials to match, and therefore are not considered to give rise to any detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the property or wider area. The proposed porch canopy would replace an existing porch canopy of a smaller scale, therefore this would be considered a minor addition which would not result in any harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposed fenestration alterations would be considered minor works which would not give rise to any material impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling or wider area. Regarding the siting of the proposal, the most potentially impacted neighbouring dwellings are deemed to be properties known as Mistel to the west and No. 48 Russell Drive to the south. In terms of neighbouring amenity, the proposed works would be sited some 4.5 metres from neighbouring property, Mistel. In addition, there is a levels difference between these dwellings, with Mistel sitting notably higher than the application site, and given this relationship, the retained separation distance, and the single-storey nature of the proposal, the works are not considered to give rise to any impacts on the amenity of this neighbouring dwelling. The proposal includes the addition of one window to the north elevation facing this neighbouring property, given the above relationship, this would not give rise to any opportunities for overlooking or loss of privacy. To the south, No. 48 Russell Drive retains a separation distance of a minimum of 2 metres from the proposed extensions, which do not surpass the southeast building line adjacent to this property. There is also a levels difference between these dwellings, with No. 48 sitting at a lower level than the application site, however, this neighbouring dwelling does not include any windows on its north elevation facing No. 46 and as such the works would not give rise to any unacceptable loss of light or overbearing impact to this neighbouring dwelling. All other neighbouring dwellings are sufficiently separated and/ or screened from the proposal as to where they would not be detrimentally impacted. The proposal does not create any additional bedrooms and therefore would not be required to demonstrate further onsite parking. The proposal would not adversely affect the existing parking or access arrangements at the application site and would therefore be acceptable on a like-for-like basis. Ampthill Town Council were consulted on this application and raised no objections. The Tree and Landscape officer was consulted on the proposal and noted that the proposed extensions are not likely to affect the surrounding trees or roots at the site. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 11 of Central Bedfordshire Design Guide, Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and Chapter 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).Reasons for Granting: The application site comprises a detached, bungalow located on the west side of Russell Drive, Ampthill. No. 46 is constructed of brickwork featuring white render and a tiled gable roof. The property currently benefits from a conservatory to the west elevation and a single, detached garage to the north. The proposal seeks planning permission for the demolition of existing conservatory and the erection of a single storey rear extension, a single-storey side extension with a rooflight, a porch canopy and alterations to fenestration. The proposed rear extension would have a maximum depth of 2.5 metres, a width of 11.2 metres and a maximum flat roof height to 2.9 metres. To the west elevation, the proposed side extension would have a maximum depth of 7.1 metres, a width of 4.1 and a maximum flat roof height to 3.2 metres. Russell Drive is characterised by detached bungalows of similar age and design. Rear and side additions to other properties across the streetscene are noted, as such the works are not considered to be at odds with the existing pattern or grain of development. The property remains set back from Russell Drive, with the proposed additions largely retained to the rear of the site, and as such the works would not be readily visible within the streetscene. The proposed addition to the west would sit partially within the footprint of the existing conservatory and all other development would be sited on areas of existing hardstanding. The proposals would remain subservient additions to the host dwelling, constructed of materials to match, and therefore are not considered to give rise to any detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the property or wider area. The proposed porch canopy would replace an existing porch canopy of a smaller scale, therefore this would be considered a minor addition which would not result in any harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposed fenestration alterations would be considered minor works which would not give rise to any material impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling or wider area. Regarding the siting of the proposal, the most potentially impacted neighbouring dwellings are deemed to be properties known as Mistel to the west and No. 48 Russell Drive to the south. In terms of neighbouring amenity, the proposed works would be sited some 4.5 metres from neighbouring property, Mistel. In addition, there is a levels difference between these dwellings, with Mistel sitting notably higher than the application site, and given this relationship, the retained separation distance, and the single-storey nature of the proposal, the works are not considered to give rise to any impacts on the amenity of this neighbouring dwelling. The proposal includes the addition of one window to the north elevation facing this neighbouring property, given the above relationship, this would not give rise to any opportunities for overlooking or loss of privacy. To the south, No. 48 Russell Drive retains a separation distance of a minimum of 2 metres from the proposed extensions, which do not surpass the southeast building line adjacent to this property. There is also a levels difference between these dwellings, with No. 48 sitting at a lower level than the application site, however, this neighbouring dwelling does not include any windows on its north elevation facing No. 46 and as such the works would not give rise to any unacceptable loss of light or overbearing impact to this neighbouring dwelling. All other neighbouring dwellings are sufficiently separated and/ or screened from the proposal as to where they would not be detrimentally impacted. The proposal does not create any additional bedrooms and therefore would not be required to demonstrate further onsite parking. The proposal would not adversely affect the existing parking or access arrangements at the application site and would therefore be acceptable on a like-for-like basis. Ampthill Town Council were consulted on this application and raised no objections. The Tree and Landscape officer was consulted on the proposal and noted that the proposed extensions are not likely to affect the surrounding trees or roots at the site. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 11 of Central Bedfordshire Design Guide, Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and Chapter 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 2 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications. 3 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 4 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. 5 )Please note that the unnumbered drawings submitted in connection with this application have been given unique numbers by the Local Planning Authority. The numbers can be sourced by examining the plans on the View a Planning Application pages of the Councils website www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk.Please note that the unnumbered drawings submitted in connection with this application have been given unique numbers by the Local Planning Authority. The numbers can be sourced by examining the plans on the View a Planning Application pages of the Councils website www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk. 6 )Will a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bandsWill a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bands
Decision date
9 Oct 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 52 days from validation, about the council's usual 54 days. Approved, as 84% of demolitions here are.

71%decided within 8 weeks
84%approved
173decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Central Bedfordshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Central Bedfordshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 18 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
18 Aug 2026
Comments by
24 Sept 2026
Site or press notice
2 Sept 2026
Central Bedfordshire
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#88 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Central Bedfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #218 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #169 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #62 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #99 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
153 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
29 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
45 decided
1,444
Total decisions
226 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.