Memorial garden and garden ruin at Broomfield House Broomfield Park, Palmers Green, London N13
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Enfield Planning Committee on 14 Jul 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed partial demolition of unsafe parts of the listed house, a memorial garden, landscape restoration, paths, seating and interpretation.
“PROPOSAL: Dismantle part of Broomfield House to create a memorial garden, involving removing unstable walls and adapting sound sections, to facilitate its use as a garden and turn the remaining footprint of the ruin into a garden space with landscape restoration. (Planning Permission & Listed Building Consent)”
Officer report
The site and its condition
The site is a Grade II* listed house in a Grade II registered park, vacant since 1999 after extensive fire damage and long-term disrepair.
“The site comprises the Grade-II* listed Broomfield House and its surrounding setting, all of which lie within the Grade-II registered park and garden.”
“An early eighteenth-century rectangular stable block stands to the south of Broomfield House and has remained vacant since 1999. The stable court is enclosed by high brick walls dating from the early eighteenth century, which together with the building form an architecturally and historically significant ensemble.”
Officer report
Heritage and landscape safeguards
The proposal would retain viable historic elements, conserve salvaged fabric including the Lanscroon mural, and require detailed conditions and legal obligations.
“The assessment therefore focuses on whether the proposals deliver sufficient public benefits to outweigh the identified harm. In this regard, the sensitive treatment, retention, meaningful incorporation, and/or public display of salvaged historic fabric are fundamental to delivering such benefits.”
“The scheme also introduces a substantial layer of new landscape interventions, including an extensive path network, seating, interpretation features, and associated infrastructure. While these elements are capable of delivering public benefits in terms of access and engagement, there is a risk that their cumulative impact could erode the spatial clarity, hierarchy, and character of the historic landscape if not carefully controlled.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Historic England, heritage, archaeology, parks, buildings, trees and transport consultees raised no objections subject to safeguards, while one public representation supported the scheme.
“Historic England (Greater London Archaeology No objections subject to conditions requiring a Historic Building Investigation (WSI), Archaeological Investigation (WSI) and Public Engagement Strategy.”
“Advisory Service) (GLAAS) London Historic Parks and Gardens Trust No objections. Support this application. Historic Buildings & Places No objections. Accept that the building is now beyond repair and recognise the public benefits of the ‘Unlocking Broomfield House’ project. This is subject to a condition securing the salvaged doors, panelling, etc. that were removed from the site after the earlier fires, including the stair hall murals.”
Officer report
Members’ questions
Members asked about funding, tree removals, replacement planting, plaques and murals; officers explained the funding position, tree safeguards and proposed park interpretation boards.
“In response to Members’ queries relating to trees, officers replied that all but 3 of the trees to be removed were lower quality category C or U. There was a condition for a protection plan and tree planting details, and officers could seek like for like replacement as a minimum, though these may be located in the wider park, as one of the reasons some of the trees were being removed, was that they’d been planted in the wrong locations previously and were doing more harm…”
“In response to Members’ enquiries in respect of a plaque and murals, officers responded that the murals didn’t form part of this project, but there would be boards throughout the park explaining the history of the site.”
Minutes
The committee vote
Members voted unanimously for both the planning application and listed building consent, with 11 votes for and none against or abstaining.
“The planning application having been put to the vote; Members voted:”
“The listed building consent having been put to the vote; Members voted:”
Minutes
The decision
The committee authorised planning permission and listed building consent, subject to conditions, a Shadow Section 106 agreement for planning permission and a Memorandum of Understanding.
“That in accordance with Regulation 3 of the Town and Country Planning General Regulations 1992 the Director of Planning and Growth be authorised to GRANT planning permission subject to conditions and the completion of a Shadow Section 106 agreement to secure the matters covered in this report and to be appended to the decision notice and a Memorandum of Understanding being entered into to secure the obligations contained in the Shadow Legal agreement. 2.”
Minutes
Sources
- Enfield Planning Committee minutes, 14 July 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Enfield's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Enfield Planning Committee
- Council
- Enfield
- Date
- Tuesday 14 July 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Enfield committee decisions →
This committee's year
24 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.