Garden office outbuilding at 48B Ventnor Villas, Hove

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Brighton And Hove Planning Committee on 4 Feb 2026.

BH2025/02302Approved

What was proposed

Permission was sought for a single-storey outbuilding in the southeast corner of the rear garden, to be used as an office incidental to the flat.

“Planning permission is sought for the erection of a single-storey outbuilding in the southeast corner of the rear garden of 48B Ventnor Villas.”

“During the course of determining the application, the description was amended to refer to the structure as an 'outbuilding' rather than an 'annex' to more accurately reflect the use of the building. The outbuilding is to be used as an office incidental to the flat.”

Officer report

The site

The site is the private rear garden of the lower-ground-floor flat within a two-storey-above-basement semi-detached building in the Cliftonville Conservation Area.

“The application site relates to the lower ground floor flat of a two storey above basement semi-detached building on the east side of Ventnor Villas. The rear garden is privately owned by the lower ground floor flat and is not accessible to other flats within the building. The site is within the Cliftonville Conservation Area and is subject to The Avenues Article 4 Direction.”

Officer report

Objections received

Five objections raised concerns including privacy, noise, overshadowing, loss of light, enclosure, poor design, conservation impact and possible separate accommodation.

“Five (5) letters have been received objecting to the proposed development for the following reasons: • Adverse effect on listed building • Adversely effects conservation area • Detrimental effect on property value • Loss of privacy/overlooking • Noise • Overshadowing • Restriction of view • Too close to the boundary • Loss of outlook • Loss of light • Increased sense of enclosure • Loss of openness • Overdevelopment • Loss of green space • Uncertainty over intended…”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee unanimously agreed the officer recommendation, so planning permission was granted.

“This application was not called for discussion. The officer recommendation was therefore taken as having been agreed unanimously.”

Minutes

Conditions on permission

The permission requires compliance with approved drawings, commencement within three years and use of the outbuilding only for purposes incidental to the main dwelling.

“The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. Reason: To ensure that the Local Planning Authority retains the right to review unimplemented permissions.”

“The outbuilding (home office) hereby approved shall only be used for purposes incidental to the main dwelling. Reason: To ensure the use of the development hereby permitted it appropriate for its location and does not unduly impact on the amenity of neighbours, in accordance with Policy DM20 of Brighton & Hove City Plan Part 2.”

Officer report

Sources

  • Brighton And Hove Planning Committee minutes, 4 February 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Brighton And Hove's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 4 February 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

53 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →