Self-build four-bedroom house at Land Off Station Road (Opposite Marling House), Wadhurst
Summary of planning committee decision
Deferred by Wealden Minors Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a self-build four-bedroom detached house, double garage with annexe space, landscaping and associated works.
“Application WD/2025/1582/F Report to: Minors Planning Committee Date: 9 September 2026 Site address: LAND OFF STATION ROAD (OPPOSITE MARLING HOUSE), WADHURST, TN5 6RT Proposal: PROPOSED SELF BUILD 4 BED DETACHED HOUSE, DOUBLE GARAGE WITH ANNEXE SPACE ABOVE, LANDSCAPING AND ASSOCIATED WORKS.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site was a field outside Wadhurst’s development boundary, within the High Weald National Landscape, near homes, bus stops and Wadhurst station.
“Executive Summary The site constitutes a field on the southern side of Station Road. While there is evidence of an access onto the land, with a five bar gate in situ, the site access on the roadside is currently overgrown. The site is located on the outskirts of the Wadhurst Development Boundary, and within the High Weald National Landscape.”
“Site and Surroundings The site constitutes a field on the southern side of Station Road. While there is evidence of an access onto the land, with a five bar gate in situ, the site access on the roadside is currently overgrown. Site Constraints The application site is subject to the following constraints: • Located outside the defined development boundary for Wadhurst • Within the High Weald Area National Landscape; • Within the Amber impact risk zone for great crested newts.”
Officer report
Planning history
There was no relevant planning history on the site and no pre-application advice had been given.
“Relevant Planning History There is no relevant planning history on the site pertinent to the determination of this application.”
Officer report
Objections received
Five objections raised concerns about highway safety, parking, car dependence, design, glazing, groundworks, ecology and the water pipeline.
“Further response received 11 March 2026: No objection. Further clarification required on tree removal, conditions otherwise recommended. WDC Pollution Control Consultation response received 29 September 2025 - No comments to make. WDC Conservation & Design (verbal comments) - No settings issues expected in relation to heritage assets. Representations 5 Notifications of objection to the application raise the following issues:”
“Access does not meet highway safety or visibility requirements • Access has not been used for years • Where would delivery vehicles, visitors and Council refuse park / access the site? • Speed limit often exceeded by drivers • Would still be over-reliant on use of private car to access services • Significant groundworks required • Design not acceptable when considering High Weald and Wadhust PC plans • Too much glazing proposed • Design out of character with locality •…”
Officer report
Why consideration was deferred
Late correspondence from counsel acting for the parish council raised issues about the revised national framework, the updated assessment and available meeting time.
“Before application WD/2025/1582/F was considered, the Head of Planning and Environmental Services advised the Committee that correspondence had been received from Counsel acting on behalf of Wadhurst Parish Council late on the evening before the meeting.”
“The Head of Planning and Environmental Services, Stacey Robins, advised that internal legal advice had been taken. The advice was that the correspondence raised issues relating to the recent publication of the revised NPPF, the updated officer assessment and the limited time available before the meeting.”
Minutes
What the committee decided
The chair agreed to defer the application, and it was not considered on its planning merits.
“The Chair agreed that the item should be deferred, noting that there were a number of moving parts and that further time would assist.”
“The item was therefore deferred and was not considered on its planning merits.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Alison WilsonChairGreen
- Mark FairweatherVice-ChairLib Dem
- Kevin BentonIndependent
- Jane ClarkLib Dem
- Jessika HulbertGreen
- Johanna HowellConservative
- Brian RedmanConservative
- Stephen ShingIndependent
- Glynn WhiteLib Dem
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Wealden Minors Planning Committee minutes, 9 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Wealden's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Wealden Minors Planning Committee
- Council
- Wealden
- Date
- Wednesday 9 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Deferred
- Councillors
- 9Lib Dem 3Conservative 2Green 2Independent 2Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Wealden committee decisions →
This committee's year
21 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 9 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.