Householder alterations at 40 Selhurst Road, Brighton

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Brighton And Hove Planning Committee on 4 Mar 2026.

BH2025/01026Approved

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

What was proposed

The application concerned householder planning consent, including extensions, patio doors, boundary screening and a ground source heat pump.

“Councillor Cattell was informed that the raised ground levels to the rear exceed permitted development rights. If the committee refuse the application, then it is possible that the applicant would be required to reinstate the original ground levels. The Planning Manager confirmed that if the application were refused then the situation would be looked at. It was noted that the applicant would have the right of appeal.”

“Councillor Sheard was informed that the majority of the works were retrospective, including the patio doors to the study. It was noted that the condition regarding the boundary hedging required Cherry Laurel, as this would be dense, evergreen and would maintain privacy.”

Minutes

Neighbour concerns

A resident said the proposed hedge would not screen the full boundary and asked for obscure glazing to the patio doors.

“Philip Leppard addressed the committee as a resident and thanked the case officer for their diligence. The hedge proposed does not reach the garage wall on the boundary. This means not all the boundary will be screened. Please ensure that the hedge continues all the way to the garage.”

Minutes

Who spoke

A resident addressed the committee about screening and glazing, while the applicant supported approval and described the works and proposed conditions.

Members’ questions

Members discussed glazing, boundary screening, raised ground levels, retrospective works, the heat pump and the proposed hedge.

“Councillor Robinson was informed that the obscure glazing was considered translucent, however, the proposed boundary screening will resolve this.”

Minutes

Condition amended

Members proposed adding fixed planters so the hedge could extend to the garage, and unanimously agreed the amendment.

“Councillor Shanks proposed that condition 2 be enhanced to include reference to fixed planters allowing the hedging to extend to the garage. Wording to be agreed.”

“The committee voted unanimously to amend condition 2.”

Minutes

The vote

The committee voted unanimously to grant planning permission.

“A vote was held, and the committee agreed unanimously to grant planning permission.”

Minutes

The decision

Planning permission was granted subject to the conditions and informatives in the report.

“RESOLVED: That the Committee has taken into consideration and agrees with the reasons for the recommendation set out in the report and resolves to GRANT planning permission subject to the Conditions and Informatives in the report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Brighton And Hove Planning Committee minutes, 4 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Brighton And Hove's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 4 March 2026
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

63 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →