Storage Barn West Of Swallows Nest Blanchards Hill Sutton Green Guildford Surrey Data via plota.co.uk

PLAN/2025/0316 - Full Planning Application Pending Consideration

Proposal

Part change of use of storage barn to class E(d) (Indoor sport, recreation or fitness) with associated parking and access. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
around 14 Jul 2025
Decision
Target date was 8 Sept 2025

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 28 Oct 2026; it is now day 471.

The consultation period closed on 20 Aug 2025.

Documents 44

Consultation & comments 39

PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF SCC HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 9 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 21 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 20 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 20 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 20 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 20 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 19 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 19 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 18 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 18 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 18 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 12 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 10 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 9 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 7 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 6 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Consultee Comment · 6 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 5 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 5 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 4 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 4 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 4 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF NEIGH. NOTIF. - STANDARD - LIST Neighbour Notification List · 30 Jul 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Grade I listed: Sutton Place Including the Service Court Yard
List entry 1236810 · 16 m away · 2 more listed buildings within 150 m (2 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Registered park or garden: Sutton Place
Nationally designated heritage. Its significance and setting carry great weight.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Sutton Park and Sutton Green conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Wood pasture and parkland
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 15 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Woking - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Woking
Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
GU4 7QN
Received
around 14 Jul 2025
Validated
14 Jul 2025
Ward
Heathlands
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 Sept 2025
Applicant
Show
Agent
Mercer Planning Ltd

Decision outlook

Day 471, past the statutory target. 83% of full applications in Woking are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 23 Oct 2026.

Day 471415 days past the 56-day target
32%decided within 8 weeks
75%approved
11%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Woking in the last twelve months, from validation. Woking decision record →

Public comments

37comments received
37 supporting

100% support · above the UK average of 16%

13 neighbours consulted · Last counted 23 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
20 Aug 2025
Statutory expiry
8 Sept 2025
Env. assessment
No
Woking
Planning Authority Score
3.1/10
Poor
#234 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Woking is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #217 out of 296. Woking is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 84% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 84% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Woking decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #254 of 296
84%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #258 of 296
54%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #217 of 296
38%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #136 of 296
55%
Minor dwellings approved
40 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
1 decided (10+ homes)
72%
Change of use approved
18 decided
736
Total decisions
133 refused in the year to March 2026