Emeb Sub Station Jubilee Avenue Corby Data via plota.co.uk

26/02074/TEL - Telecomms - Part 16, Class A Approved

Proposal

Proposed replacement of an existing 21m lattice tower with a new 22.5m monopole with the installation of 9no new antennas and ancillary development Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
24 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
29 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
6 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
22 Sept 2026

Approved on 22 Sept 2026 · Officer Delegated Decision · Last checked 23 Sept 2026

Site constraints 4

Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Corby built-up area; Priority habitat 15 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in North Northamptonshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Telecomms - Part 16, Class A
Received
24 Jul 2026
Validated
29 Jul 2026
Ward
Kingswood
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Sept 2026
Decision
Prior Approval Not Required
Decision date
22 Sept 2026
Decision level
Officer Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Causeway Telecoms Planning

How this decision compares

Decided in 55 days from validation, 10 days faster than North Northamptonshire's median of 65 for demolitions. Approved, as 79% of demolitions here are.

46%decided within 8 weeks
79%approved
99decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by North Northamptonshire in the last twelve months, from validation. North Northamptonshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 23 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15103315
Planning Portal ref
PP-15103315
Consultation
6 Aug 2026
Comments by
27 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
6 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
22 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
North Northamptonshire
Planning Authority Score
1.3/10
Poor
#285 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

North Northamptonshire is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #279 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 64% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
North Northamptonshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #157 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #220 of 296
35%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #279 of 296
64%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #277 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
100 decided (1-9 homes)
81%
Major dwellings approved
21 decided (10+ homes)
91%
Change of use approved
75 decided
1,096
Total decisions
132 refused in the year to March 2026