Land at Meadowside Park Burley Road Bockhampton Christchurch BH23 7AL Data via plota.co.uk

P/26/03974/FUL - Full Planning Permission Refused

Proposal

Siting of two caravans for residential occupation (Gypsy/Traveller) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Aug 2026
✗
Refused
14 Oct 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 14 Oct 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 16 Oct 2026

Documents 49

Consultation & comments 37

PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 4 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 24 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Environment Agency - Response Consultee Response · 23 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee Response Highways Response · 17 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Environmental Agency - Response 04-09-2026 Consultee Response · 17 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 15 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 15 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee Response Highways Response · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee Response Highways Response · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Burton & Winkton Parish Council - Objection Consultee Response · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 13 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 13 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 12 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 12 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 10 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 10 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 10 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 10 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 6 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 6 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 30 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 30 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF FCERM Consultee Response Consultee Response · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF FCERM Consultee Response Consultee Response · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 26 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 26 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF BCP Waste & Recycling Consultee Response · 24 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BCP Waste & Recycling Consultee Response · 24 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

Green belt: South West Hampshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Nutrient neutrality catchment: River Avon SAC
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
National infrastructure project: Navitus Bay Wind Park
The site is inside the project boundary. Generating station, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Flood defence about 18 m from the postcode pin (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 2 year flood).
Not affected
No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
BCP
Application type
Full Planning Permission
Postcode
BH23 7AL
Received
19 Aug 2026
Validated
19 Aug 2026
Ward
Burton & Grange
Parish
Burton & Winkton Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Decision
Refused
Decision date
14 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
GB Planning Solutions

How this decision compares

Decided in 56 days from validation, 10 days faster than BCP's median of 66 for new homes. Refused, as 35% of new homes here are.

37%decided within 8 weeks
65%approved
123decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by BCP in the last twelve months, from validation. BCP decision record →

Public comments

14comments received
14 objecting

100% object · above the UK average of 74%

Last counted 8 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
15 Sept 2026
Comments by
6 Oct 2026
BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026