Millstream, Trajectus Way, Keynsham, Bath And North East Somerset, Data via plota.co.uk

26/02871/M6A - Modify S106A Obligation Pending Consideration

Proposal

Modification to the Section 106 agreement associated with planning permission with regard to the payment trigger and spending of the Targeted Training and Recruitment Contribution Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
31 Jul 2026
Decision
Target date was 25 Sept 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 25 Sept 2026.

Associated applications 4

  • Part of

    Fullcouncil archive

    Conditions variation sought for

    • Planning obligationModification to the Section 106 agreement with regard to the payment trigger and spending…This application26/02871/M6A
    • Show 2 more · 2 approved

Site constraints 5

Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Scheduled monument about 121 m away: Roman Settlement at Keynsham Hams, former Cadbury's Factory
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Roman Well at Ngr St 6571 6939, Grade II, about 55 m from the postcode pin
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Keynsham built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Bath - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Bath
Application type
Modify S106A Obligation
Received
31 Jul 2026
Validated
31 Jul 2026
Ward
Keynsham North
Parish
Keynsham Town Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 Sept 2026
Applicant
Show
Bath
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#157 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Bath is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #236 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Bath decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #17 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #26 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #236 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #199 of 296
87%
Minor dwellings approved
172 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
85%
Change of use approved
26 decided
1,817
Total decisions
96 refused in the year to March 2026