Seven student apartments at 5-9 Tavistock Street, Royal Leamington Spa
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Warwick Planning Committee on 16 Jun 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
What was proposed
The application sought to retain an existing facade and construct seven student accommodation apartments providing 32 bedrooms, with associated works.
“The Committee considered an application from Ni Ann Limited for retention of existing facade and construction of a new building containing seven purpose-built student accommodation apartments (to provide a total of 32 bedrooms) and associated works.”
Minutes
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the identified heritage harm was not outweighed by demonstrated public benefits.
“Officers were of the opinion that the proposal would result in harm to the curtilage listed building, at a level which was not outweighed by the potential public benefits. It was noted that the proposed extent of demolition of the curtilage listed building in this revised scheme represented an improvement overall to the previously refused scheme. It…”
“Whilst the level of harm identified from the extent of demolition was now considered to amount to a lower level of less than substantial, a recognised improvement when compared to the previous degree of harm identified as substantial, an assessment of the submitted public benefits had resulted in the same conclusions as previously drawn; that in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, it was not considered there are any such public benefits demonstrated which would…”
Minutes
Support for the application
More than five comments supported the application, which led to its presentation to the committee.
“The application was presented to Committee because more than five comments had been received in support of the application, and it was recommended for refusal.”
Minutes
Committee consideration
The committee considered the report, presentation and representations before a motion was proposed and seconded to grant the application.
“Following consideration of the report, presentation, and representations made at the meeting, it was proposed by Councillor Kennedy and seconded by Councillor R Dickson that the application should be granted.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The committee resolved to grant the application, subject to conditions agreed by the Head of Place, Arts, and Economy with the committee chair.
“Resolved that W/26/0090 LB application be granted, subject to conditions for which authority for was delegated to the Head of Place, Arts, and Economy in consultation with the Committee Chair to agree.”
Minutes
Sources
- Warwick Planning Committee minutes, 16 June 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Warwick's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Warwick Planning Committee
- Council
- Warwick
- Date
- Tuesday 16 June 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Warwick committee decisions →
This committee's year
30 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.