Lakes 103 103A And 104 London Road Fairford Gloucestershire Data via plota.co.uk

25/02062/OUT - Outline Application Approved

Proposal

Amendment to conditions 1 (commencement of development), 2 (reserved matters), 3 (commencement of development), 4 (building appearance) and vary conditions 5 (Site Landscaping), 6 (building heights), 7 (FRA), 14 (cycle storage), 18 (archaeological work), 19 (landscaping), 25 (illumination), 26 (noise control), 32 (height and location of buildings) & 34 (approved plans) of permission for Tourism and recreational development comprising the erection of 59 pavilions, leisure facility, access, car parking, landscaping and ecological management to amend the layout of internal roads and units and incorporate previously approved details and subsequent planning applications Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
2 Jul 2025
✓
Validated
3 Jul 2025
✗
Appeal dismissed
6 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
14 Oct 2026

Approved on 14 Oct 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 15 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

SSSI: Cotswold Water Park SSSI
Natural England must be consulted on work that may affect it.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Tree preservation order: Lakes 103 & 104 Fairford (alt ref 15 ; 216)
Consent is needed before work on protected trees.
Not every council has published its orders as open data, so no order shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Sssi
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3.
Not affected
Not green belt · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 15 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Cotswold - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Cotswold
Application type
Outline Application
Received
2 Jul 2025
Validated
3 Jul 2025
Ward
Lechlade, Kempsford & Fairford South
Parish
Fairford
Case officer
Show
Target decision
16 Oct 2026
Decision
Application Permit
Decision date
14 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Appeal
Dismissed · 6 Aug 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 6006558 ↗
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 468 days from validation, 376 days slower than Cotswold's median of 92 for reserved matters. Approved, as 96% of reserved matters here are.

27%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for reserved matters decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent reserved matters in Cotswold to go on. Cotswold decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

123 neighbours consulted · Last counted 15 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
7 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Oct 2025
Env. assessment
No
Cotswold
Planning Authority Score
3.5/10
Below average
#218 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Cotswold is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #219 out of 296. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cotswold decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #128 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #150 of 296
53%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #219 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #212 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
123 decided (1-9 homes)
74%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
38 decided
1,252
Total decisions
138 refused in the year to March 2026