Fisher Common Nursery Fisher Lane North Mundham Chichester West Sussex PO20 1YU Data via plota.co.uk

26/00290/DOC - Discharge of Conditions Decided

Proposal

Discharge of conditions 3 (Surface Water Drainage Scheme), 4 (Sustainable Design and Construction), 5 (Material Schedule), 6 (Remediation), and 7 ( Package Treatment Plant) of permission . Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
5 Feb 2026
✓
Consultation
17 Feb 2026
✓
Partially Discharge
31 Mar 2026

Partially Discharge on 31 Mar 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 25 Jul 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 3, 4, 5, 6 decided (outcome not recorded)

    • ConditionsDischarge of conditions 3 (Surface Water Drainage Scheme), 4 (Sustainable Design…This application26/00290/DOC

Site constraints 4

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 1. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Traditional orchards
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3; Priority habitat about 3 m away: Traditional orchard.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chichester - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Chichester
Application type
Discharge of Conditions
Postcode
PO20 1YU
Received
5 Feb 2026
Validated
5 Feb 2026
Ward
North Mundham And Tangmere
Parish
North Mundham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Apr 2026
Decision
Partially Discharge
Decision date
31 Mar 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Manorwood

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14677166
Planning Portal ref
PP-14677166
Consultation
17 Feb 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Chichester
Planning Authority Score
8.9/10
Excellent
#6 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Chichester is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #10 out of 296. Only 18% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Chichester decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #127 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #72 of 296
93%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #10 of 296
18%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #15 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
76%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
74%
Change of use approved
34 decided
935
Total decisions
107 refused in the year to March 2026