27 Birch Close, Broom, Biggleswade, SG18 9NR Data via plota.co.uk
Proposal
Removal of conservatory and erection of a single storey rear extension with roof lantern, single storey infill side extension for new entrance porch, part conversion of garage with new pitched roof and front canopy, and external alterations. Data via plota.co.uk
Application progress
Approved on 2 Jul 2026 · Last checked 18 Oct 2026
Site constraints 4
Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.
Building
From the energy performance certificate lodged in January 2021, the latest held for this property, matched to this application by its address. The building may have changed since. View the certificate
Every application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.
Important details
- Council
- Central Bedfordshire
- Application type
- Full Application
- Postcode
- SG18 9NR
- Received
- 15 Apr 2026
- Validated
- 12 May 2026
- Parish
- Southill
- Case officer
- Show
- Target decision
- 7 Jul 2026
- Decision
- Full Application - Granted Conditions or Reasons: View Conditions or Reasons Informative Notes: 1 )Reasons for Granting The site comprises a two-storey detached dwelling at 27 Birch Close, Broom, constructed of brickwork with hanging tile, a tiled roof and white uPVC windows. It has a flat roofed double garage to the side and a conservatory to the rear. The property is location within an established residential cul-de-sac of a similar age and character. ��� The proposal comprises the removal of the conservatory and erection of a single storey rear flat roofed extension with roof lantern. Due to its scale and siting it would appear subservient to the main dwelling and would not be visible from the streetscene. A single storey infill side extension is also proposed between the dwelling and garage to form a new entrance porch, including a partial garage conversion. A pitched roof would extend over the infill and existing garage, incorporating a front canopy. Minor alterations to ground floor fenestration on the side and rear are also proposed. Overall, the side extension would read as a cohesive, set-back, and subservient addition. A materials condition can be attached. The rear garden of No 23 Broom Close lies to the north of the site. Given the single-storey scale of the proposed development and its separation from the boundary, no adverse impact on the residential amenity of this property would arise. No. 25 Birch Close lies to the west, offset approximately 1.8m from the shared boundary. While the proposed 4.6m deep rear extension would be slightly larger than the conservatory it replaces and would extend to the boundary, its single-storey form and the retained separation to No. 25 would avoid any unacceptable loss of light or overbearing impact. A condition can be attached to ensure it remains blank sided to protect neighbouring privacy. The proposed pitched roof over the garage would be adjacent to the flat-roofed garage at No. 29 Birch Close, which sits forward of the dwelling and contains a ground-floor kitchen window nearest the boundary. Given the scale of the roof alteration and the relationship between the properties, no undue loss of light, privacy or overbearing impact would result. Overall, by virtue of its scale, siting and design, the proposal would not have a detrimental impact on neighbouring residential amenity. On the basis of the scale and nature of the development, adequate access and parking has been retained. The proposed development lies within the historic core of Broom (HER 17138), a heritage asset of archaeological interest as defined by the NPPF. However, given the limited scale and nature of the works, partly within the existing conservatory footprint, significant impacts on archaeological remains are unlikely. Therefore, no objection is raised on archaeological grounds. Neighbouring properties have been consulted on the application and no comments have been received. Southill Parish Council were consulted and have not commented on the proposal. In light of the foregoing appraisal, it is considered that the proposal would be in accordance with Policies HQ1 and T3 of the Adopted Central Bedford shire Local Plan (2021), the Adopted Central Bedford shire Design Guide (August 2023), the Parking Standards for New Development SPD (August 2023) and Section 12 of the NPPF (2024).Reasons for Granting The site comprises a two-storey detached dwelling at 27 Birch Close, Broom, constructed of brickwork with hanging tile, a tiled roof and white uPVC windows. It has a flat roofed double garage to the side and a conservatory to the rear. The property is location within an established residential cul-de-sac of a similar age and character. ��� The proposal comprises the removal of the conservatory and erection of a single storey rear flat roofed extension with roof lantern. Due to its scale and siting it would appear subservient to the main dwelling and would not be visible from the streetscene. A single storey infill side extension is also proposed between the dwelling and garage to form a new entrance porch, including a partial garage conversion. A pitched roof would extend over the infill and existing garage, incorporating a front canopy. Minor alterations to ground floor fenestration on the side and rear are also proposed. Overall, the side extension would read as a cohesive, set-back, and subservient addition. A materials condition can be attached. The rear garden of No 23 Broom Close lies to the north of the site. Given the single-storey scale of the proposed development and its separation from the boundary, no adverse impact on the residential amenity of this property would arise. No. 25 Birch Close lies to the west, offset approximately 1.8m from the shared boundary. While the proposed 4.6m deep rear extension would be slightly larger than the conservatory it replaces and would extend to the boundary, its single-storey form and the retained separation to No. 25 would avoid any unacceptable loss of light or overbearing impact. A condition can be attached to ensure it remains blank sided to protect neighbouring privacy. The proposed pitched roof over the garage would be adjacent to the flat-roofed garage at No. 29 Birch Close, which sits forward of the dwelling and contains a ground-floor kitchen window nearest the boundary. Given the scale of the roof alteration and the relationship between the properties, no undue loss of light, privacy or overbearing impact would result. Overall, by virtue of its scale, siting and design, the proposal would not have a detrimental impact on neighbouring residential amenity. On the basis of the scale and nature of the development, adequate access and parking has been retained. The proposed development lies within the historic core of Broom (HER 17138), a heritage asset of archaeological interest as defined by the NPPF. However, given the limited scale and nature of the works, partly within the existing conservatory footprint, significant impacts on archaeological remains are unlikely. Therefore, no objection is raised on archaeological grounds. Neighbouring properties have been consulted on the application and no comments have been received. Southill Parish Council were consulted and have not commented on the proposal. In light of the foregoing appraisal, it is considered that the proposal would be in accordance with Policies HQ1 and T3 of the Adopted Central Bedford shire Local Plan (2021), the Adopted Central Bedford shire Design Guide (August 2023), the Parking Standards for New Development SPD (August 2023) and Section 12 of the NPPF (2024). 2 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications. 3 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 4 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.
- Decision date
- 2 Jul 2026
- Agent
- Show
How this decision compares
Decided in 51 days from validation, about the council's usual 54 days. Approved, as 90% of extensions here are.
Plota live figures for extensions decided by Central Bedfordshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Central Bedfordshire decision record →
Public comments
No public comments yet.
Last counted 18 Oct 2026
Consultation & key dates
- Consultation
- 12 May 2026
- Comments by
- 25 Jun 2026
- Site or press notice
- 4 Jun 2026
Historical activity at this location
9 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Nearby activity
Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).
Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.
Track this application
27 Birch Close, Broom, Biggleswade, SG18 9NR
Tracking this application
Not there after a minute? Check your junk folder. It's from alerts@plota.co.uk.
Go to your dashboard →Sign in to view contact details
Applicant and case-officer names are hidden from public view for privacy. Create a free Plota account - or sign back in - and we'll show them, plus you get a dashboard for alerts and tracked applications.
