Longvernal Primary School , Longvernal, Midsomer Norton, Bath And North East Somerset, BA3 2LP Data via plota.co.uk

26/02268/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Erection of new boundary fence to a height of 2m at the entrance and 3m on the boundary. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
12 Jun 2026
✓
Validated
14 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
1 Sept 2026

Approved on 1 Sept 2026 · Last checked 3 Oct 2026

Site constraints 4

Public footpath about 19 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Midsomer Norton built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Bath - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Bath
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
BA3 2LP
Received
12 Jun 2026
Validated
14 Jul 2026
Ward
Midsomer Norton Redfield
Parish
Midsomer Norton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 Sept 2026
Decision
PERMIT
Decision date
1 Sept 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Your Design Group Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 49 days from validation, 6 days faster than Bath's median of 55 for extensions. Approved, as 98% of extensions here are.

61%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
644decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Bath in the last twelve months, from validation. Bath decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Planning Portal ref
PP-15007600
Bath
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#157 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Bath is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #236 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Bath decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #17 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #26 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #236 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #199 of 296
87%
Minor dwellings approved
172 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
85%
Change of use approved
26 decided
1,817
Total decisions
96 refused in the year to March 2026