Householder planning consent at 21 Chailey Avenue, Rottingdean, Brighton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Brighton And Hove Planning Committee on 4 Feb 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
What people said
Objecting residents described overdevelopment, harm to neighbours and local character, while the applicant said alterations addressed concerns and supported the proposal.
“Nigel Smith addressed the committee on behalf of objecting residents and stated that they considered the proposals to be an overdevelopment, transforming this modest cottage. The proposals increase the width, depth and height of the property giving an overbearing and terraced appearance. The development fails the Rottingdean Neighbourhood Plan, particularly policies S1 and H2. It also fails City Plan Part 2 policies DM18, DM21 and SPD12.”
“Robert Stevens addressed the committee as the applicant and stated that they owner of 21 Chailey Avenue and were appearing at committee following a lobbying of Rottingdean Parish Council by local residents. The applicant had acknowledged neighbours’ concerns and made alterations. The proposals were to maintain the unique style of the property and the design was to create a well-balanced home, more in line with the neighbouring properties.”
Minutes
Questions about the proposal
Members discussed the garage, height, flooding, hardstanding, overlooking, light, glazing, gaps between properties and the character of the area.
“Councillor Pickett was informed that the existing garage was to be retained and the height would be the same as the neighbouring properties.”
“Councillor Thomson was informed that with regards to flooding, the hardstanding already exists, the garden area is not part of the application and there is no loss of light to neighbouring properties. The application has been amended with the reduction of the upper balcony, side windows and the insertion of obscure glazing to prevent overlooking.”
Minutes
Members’ views
Members generally supported the application, citing the area’s varied houses, available space, limited overlooking and absence of harm to the national park.
“Councillor Pickett noted the large garden and there was not much overlooking, and plenty of space in the area. The councillor supported the application.”
“Councillor Parrott was unable to see the objections, and they considered the proposals were not too close to the plot boundary, and there was no impact on the South Downs National Park. The councillor supported the application.”
Minutes
The decision
The committee unanimously granted planning permission subject to the conditions and informatives in the report.
“A vote was held, and the committee agreed unanimously to grant planning permission. (Councillor Theobald took no part in the decision-making or vote)”
“RESOLVED: That the Committee has taken into consideration and agrees with the reasons for the recommendation set out in the report and resolves to GRANT planning permission subject to the Conditions and Informatives in the report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Brighton And Hove Planning Committee minutes, 4 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Brighton And Hove's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Brighton And Hove Planning Committee
- Council
- Brighton And Hove
- Date
- Wednesday 4 February 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Brighton And Hove committee decisions →
This committee's year
53 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.