Lindrick Dale Nursery Worksop Road South Anston 9999 Data via plota.co.uk

RB2025/1432 Approved

Proposal

Prior Notification of Intent to erect 4 No. Poly tunnels (Permitted Development under Part 6 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015) Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
29 Oct 2025
✓
Validated
30 Oct 2025
✓
Approved
25 Nov 2025

Approved on 25 Nov 2025 · Delegated (Part 2A) · Last checked 15 Oct 2026

Documents 1

Plans & drawings 1

PDF 20230208153018Single Poly Tunnel Elevations.pdf drawing · 30 Oct 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 9

SSSI: Lindrick Golf Course SSSI
Natural England must be consulted on work that may affect it.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Public footpath about 1 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Priority habitat: Deciduous woodland
A habitat of principal importance. It shapes the ecology work and the biodiversity net gain a scheme has to show.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats - NEZ
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Local nature reserve about 308 m away: Anston Stones Wood
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rotherham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rotherham
Received
29 Oct 2025
Validated
30 Oct 2025
Ward
Anston & Woodsetts Ward
Parish
North and South Anston
Case officer
Show
Decision
GRANTED CONDITIONALLY
Decision date
25 Nov 2025
Decision level
Delegated (Part 2A)
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 26 days from validation, 6 days faster than Rotherham's median of 32 for prior approvals. Approved, as 87% of prior approvals here are.

98%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
58decided in the last year

Plota live figures for prior approvals decided by Rotherham in the last twelve months, from validation. Rotherham decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
30 Oct 2025
Comments by
20 Nov 2025
Statutory expiry
26 Nov 2025
Rotherham
Planning Authority Score
4.7/10
Below average
#167 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rotherham ranks #107 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Rotherham is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 71% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 71% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rotherham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
79%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #266 of 296
71%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #295 of 296
72%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #107 of 296
32%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #68 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
63 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
58 decided
750
Total decisions
156 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings