External building alterations at 4/4A Church Place, Brighton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Brighton And Hove Planning Committee on 4 Jun 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought external alterations including removing tile hanging, rendering, changing windows and doors, and regularising the existing shopfront.
“Planning permission is sought for external alterations which include removal of the first-floor tile hanging, rendering, revised fenestration including replacement front windows in sash style and new bifold doors at the rear, and regularisation of the existing shopfront fenestration.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is a two-storey building with a shop and a residential unit in a conservation area, opposite a listed church and near listed terraces.
“The application site relates to 4/4A Church Place and comprises a two-storey detached building, with a flat roof and rear projection with a terrace above. The front elevation includes rendered walls and aluminium framed shopfront at ground floor level and hanging tiles and modern uPVC windows at first-floor level. The ground floor is occupied by a commercial unit whilst the first-floor is used as a residential unit.”
“The site is an unlisted building in the Kemp Town Conservation Area. It lies directly opposite St Mark's Church which is a Grade II listed building, and to the rear of the Grade I Listed Building 13 Sussex Square, that forms part of the wider Grade I Listed terraces at Sussex Square, which form an important group of heritage assets with Arundel Terrace, Chichester Terrace, Lewes Crescent and related structures on the Esplanade.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Three earlier applications for external alterations, an additional storey or a rear extension were refused during 2023 and 2024.
“BH2024/00511 Erection of first floor rear extension and creation of central courtyard with associated external alterations including rendering existing rear and side elevations, cladding of front and side elevations and revised fenestration. Refused 05.07.2024 (on grounds of scale/design and adverse impact to heritage setting and neighbouring amenity)”
“BH2023/01516 Erection of an additional storey to provide 1no. one-bedroom flat (C3) incorporating first floor rear extension with revised fenestration, alterations to the ground floor shopfront and associated works. Refused 19.07.2023 (on grounds of design, height/scale, adverse impact to heritage setting and neighbouring amenity)”
Officer report
Specialist consultation
The Heritage team raised no objection, subject to a condition requiring a lime-rich render mix.
“Heritage: No objection subject to the imposition of conditions With the proposal now not including the additional floor proposed in the previous application BH2024/00511, the scheme is now acceptable in conservation terms. The changes in the windows pattern on the first floor is a marginal improvement of the existing arrangement. However, a condition should be added to require the render mix to be a lime rich mortar mix (at least 2 parts lime for each 1-part cement).”
Officer report
What residents said
Ten representations objected because of effects on the conservation area and listed building, retrospective shopfront works, noise, boundaries, overdevelopment and materials.
“Ten (10) representations have been received objecting to the proposal for the following reasons: • Adversely affects the Conservation Area • Retrospective works to the shopfront • Adverse affect on listed building • Noise • Too close to the boundary • Overdevelopment • Inappropriate Materials…”
“Full details of representations received can be found online on the Planning Register.”
Officer report
Conditions on permission
The permission requires approved drawings, a three-year commencement period, lime-based render and white timber replacement windows at the front.
“Conditions: 1. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved drawings listed below. Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.”
“The replacement windows to the front elevation hereby approved shall be white framed timber and shall be retained as such thereafter. Reason: To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development and to comply with policies DM26 and DM29 of Brighton & Hove City Plan Part 2, and CP15 of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part One.”
Officer report
The committee decision
The officer recommendation was agreed unanimously without discussion.
“This application was not called for discussion. The officer recommendation was therefore taken as having been agreed unanimously.”
Minutes
Sources
- Brighton And Hove Planning Committee minutes, 4 June 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Brighton And Hove's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Brighton And Hove Planning Committee
- Council
- Brighton And Hove
- Date
- Wednesday 4 June 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Brighton And Hove committee decisions →
This committee's year
15 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.