Land West of Woodstock Lane North Long Ditton Surrey KT6 Data via plota.co.uk

2025/2018 - Outline Application Refused

Proposal

Outline application for a residential development, with open space, drainage, landscaping, play areas, pumping station and all other associated works following the demolition of all existing structures. All matters reserved with the exception of vehicular access into the site from Woodstock Lane North. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 Aug 2025
✓
Validated
14 Aug 2025
✗
Refused
25 Mar 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 25 Mar 2026 · Last checked 13 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Elmbridge Planning Committee on 25 Mar 2026.

Refused

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised granting outline permission because housing benefits, affordable homes, infrastructure, biodiversity gains and other benefits outweighed limited landscape harm.
  • Objectors raised concerns about Green Belt harm, traffic, flooding, wildlife, services, village green character and the rural lane.
  • The committee refused permission, contrary to officers, because the site was not sustainable, harmed the Green Belt and lacked very special circumstances.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site, officer advice, objections, committee discussion, vote and reasons for refusal.

Source: Plota analysis of Elmbridge's committee minutes of 25 Mar 2026.

Site constraints 5

Local nature reserve about 245 m away: Stokes Field
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Conservation area about 22 m away: Long Ditton
The edge of the area; work outside it can still affect its setting.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Also on the record
4 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Green belt about 4 m away: London; Inside the West Molesey built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 13 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Elmbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Elmbridge
Application type
Outline Application
Received
6 Aug 2025
Validated
14 Aug 2025
Ward
Hinchley Wood and Weston Green WardLong Ditton Ward
Decision
Refuse Outline Permission
Decision date
25 Mar 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 223 days from validation, 156 days slower than Elmbridge's median of 67 for outline applications. Refused, as 41% of outline applications here are.

42%decided within 8 weeks
59%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for outline applications decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent outline applications in Elmbridge to go on. Elmbridge decision record →

Elmbridge
Planning Authority Score
2.6/10
Poor
#247 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Elmbridge ranks #195 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Elmbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 79% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 79% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Elmbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #277 of 296
79%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #281 of 296
57%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #195 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #178 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
195 decided (1-9 homes)
60%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
72%
Change of use approved
32 decided
1,358
Total decisions
314 refused in the year to March 2026