Former Woodman Inn Halifax Road Charlestown Hebden Bridge HX7 6PH Data via plota.co.uk

24/01070/DISC1 - Discharge Conditions 1st App Decided

Proposal

Submission of information to Discharge Conditions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 16, 17, and 18 on planning application Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
4 May 2026
✓
Consultation
15 May 2026
✓
Partially Complied With
27 Jul 2026

Partially Complied With on 27 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Sept 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Fullcouncil archive

    Conditions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 16, 17 decided (outcome not recorded)

    • ConditionsSubmission of information to Discharge Conditions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 16, 17, and 18This application24/01070/DISC1

Site constraints 10

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Bradford and South Pennines; Radon affected area, class 3; National infrastructure project: Calderdale Energy Park, at pre-application; 1 listed building within 150 m; Inside the Hebden Bridge built-up area; Flood defence 41 m away (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 20 year flood); Priority habitat 33 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 5, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Calderdale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Calderdale
Application type
Discharge Conditions 1st App
Postcode
HX7 6PH
Received
4 May 2026
Validated
4 May 2026
Ward
Hebden Bridge And Todmorden East
Parish
Blackshaw Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
27 Jul 2026
Decision
Partially Complied With
Decision date
27 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Stonehouse & Co.

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 7 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14885766
Planning Portal ref
PP-14885766
Consultation
15 May 2026
Comments by
30 May 2026
Statutory expiry
27 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Calderdale
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#240 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Calderdale ranks #193 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Calderdale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #192 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #229 of 296
58%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #193 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #223 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
103 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
61 decided
856
Total decisions
121 refused in the year to March 2026