Little Chalfont Park Land Between Lodge Lane And Burtons Lane Buckinghamshire Hertfordshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/1474/NAC - Neighbouring Authority Consultation Decided

Proposal

Neigbouring Authority Consultation: (Buckinghamshire Council) pursuant to conditions 1 (reserved matters), 13 (estate roads), 14 (walking/cycling phasing), 15 (parking and garages) ,16 (refuse), 17 (energy and sustainability), 23 (levels Northern and Eastern Parcel), 26 (noise assessment), and 29 (sustainable drainage) of planning permission reference for 282 residential units (Use Class C3) and a Local Centre (289 sqm) (Use Class E), together with associated infrastructure including landscaping, levelling works, drainage and car and cycle parking. - Buckinghamshire Council - Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
8 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 29 Sept 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 29 Sept 2026.

Site constraints 8

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Article 4 direction
Whole District excluding the Town of Chesham - Poultry production.. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Habitat network: Ancient Semi Natural Woodland
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; 1 listed building within 150 m; Tree preservation order 17 m away: The Rural District Council of Amersham Interim Tree Preservation Order [No 4 of 1948]; Inside the Little Chalfont built-up area; Priority habitat 17 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Three Rivers - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Neighbouring Authority Consultation
Received
8 Sept 2026
Validated
8 Sept 2026
Ward
NOT IN DISTRICT See Details Under Parish
Parish
Buckinghamshire Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
29 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Rachel Marber

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 8 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
29 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Three Rivers
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#54 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Three Rivers is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #30 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Three Rivers decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #145 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #184 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #30 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #28 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
94%
Change of use approved
17 decided
819
Total decisions
86 refused in the year to March 2026