Near To Littlewood Hall Farm Ridley Lane Croston Leyland PR26 9JA Data via plota.co.uk

26/00219/NOT - Telecom Mast - No Consultation Approved

Proposal

Notification of intention to install 1no. 9m high light wooden pole for the provision of fixed line broadband electronic communications Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
26 Mar 2026

Approved on 26 Mar 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 3

Green belt: Merseyside and Greater Manchester
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chorley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Chorley
Application type
Telecom Mast - No Consultation
Postcode
PR26 9JA
Received
6 Mar 2026
Validated
6 Mar 2026
Ward
Croston, Mawdesley And Euxton South
Parish
Ulnes Walton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Apr 2026
Decision
Permit Telecom Mast
Decision date
26 Mar 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 20 days from validation, 8 days faster than Chorley's median of 28 for utility and infrastructure works. Approved, as 100% of utility and infrastructure works here are.

86%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
31decided in the last year

Plota live figures for utility and infrastructure works decided by Chorley in the last twelve months, from validation. Chorley decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
2 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Chorley
Planning Authority Score
7.5/10
Good
#42 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Chorley is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #49 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Chorley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #51 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #73 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #49 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #100 of 296
95%
Minor dwellings approved
77 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
4 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
11 decided
553
Total decisions
39 refused in the year to March 2026