Brighton College Preparatory School Walpole Lodge 2 Walpole Road And Pre-Prep School Eastern Road, 2 Belle… Data via plota.co.uk

Decided BH2025/00264
Date received
30 Jan 2025
Date validated
11 Feb 2025

Description

(1) Erection of a new teaching building at the St Mary's Hall site including new classrooms, a new multi-use hall with independent access and specialist teaching rooms, associated access, hard and soft landscaping, boundary treatments and other associated works; and (2) Redevelopment of the Convent site including demolition of 20th century extensions, change of use of existing Prep School to boarding accommodation (Use Class C2), roof extension to the existing building, erection of a new building to provide boarding accommodation for students and associated residential staff, adjoining offices, common rooms, kitchens and support spaces, associated access, hard and soft landscaping, boundary treatments and other associated works including ancillary residential accommodation for the staff at 2 Belle Vue Gardens and 141 and 143 Eastern Road. Attachment of 2no new pedestrian gates to wall and proposed substation structure abutting wall at St Marys site. Data via plota.co.uk

Last checked

Planning committee

Decided by Brighton and Hove Planning Committee on 2 Jul 2025. The council has not yet issued its decision notice.

Approved

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

  • Planning officers advised that a travel plan should be secured by condition if permission was granted.
  • Residents and councillors raised concerns about policy, housing, traffic, parking, amenity and the effect on the neighbourhood.
  • The committee voted five to five, with the Chair’s casting vote granting permission subject to a legal agreement and conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposed school development, objections, supporting views, member debate, vote and conditions.

Source: Plota analysis of Brighton and Hove's committee minutes of 2 Jul 2025.

Site constraints 6

College conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Local nature reserve about 258 m away: Whitehawk/Race Hill
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
11 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Heritage at risk about 18 m away: East Cliff; Radon affected area, class 3; Inside the Brighton and Hove built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 19 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Brighton and Hove - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service
Brighton and Hove
Planning Authority Score
4.3/10
Below average
#185 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Brighton and Hove is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #238 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Brighton and Hove decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #107 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #70 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #238 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #200 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
189 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
4 decided (10+ homes)
70%
Change of use approved
63 decided
1,719
Total decisions
176 refused in the year to March 2026