Stable Toilet Block South Of Gibson Mill Midgehole Road Hebden Bridge Data via plota.co.uk

25/01285/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Upgrading of water supply to existing toilets and installation of underground pipe from Hebden Water to stables toilet block building Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
10 Feb 2026
✓
Consultation
10 Feb 2026
✓
Approved
6 May 2026

Approved on 6 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Site constraints 10

4 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Gibson Mill, Grade II, the postcode pin is inside its outline · 4 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 4 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Public footpath about 16 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 5
Very poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Priority Rivers
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Bradford and South Pennines; Radon affected area, class 3; National infrastructure project about 107 m away: Calderdale Energy Park, at pre-application; Tree preservation order about 14 m away: Rural District of Hepton; Priority habitat about 7 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Calderdale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Calderdale
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
HX7 7AS
Received
17 Dec 2025
Validated
10 Feb 2026
Ward
Hebden Bridge And Todmorden East
Parish
Heptonstall Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
7 Apr 2026
Decision
Permit
Decision date
6 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision

How this decision compares

Decided in 85 days from validation, 29 days slower than Calderdale's median of 56 for utility and infrastructure works. Approved, as 92% of utility and infrastructure works here are.

52%decided within 8 weeks
92%approved
27decided in the last year

Plota live figures for utility and infrastructure works decided by Calderdale in the last twelve months, from validation. Calderdale decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14567982
Planning Portal ref
PP-14567982
Neighbours
10 Feb 2026
Consultation
10 Feb 2026
Comments by
14 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
24 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
7 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Calderdale
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#240 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Calderdale ranks #193 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Calderdale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #192 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #229 of 296
58%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #193 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #223 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
103 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
61 decided
856
Total decisions
121 refused in the year to March 2026