Wellness and events venue at Hemingford Park, Hemingford Abbots

Summary of planning committee decision

Deferred by Huntingdonshire Development Management Committee on 20 Oct 2025.

25/01248/FULDeferred

What was proposed

The application sought to change a dwelling and agricultural land into a wellness centre, wedding and events venue, with guest accommodation and parking.

“The application seeks planning permission for the Change of use from dwelling (Use Class C3) & agricultural land to a wellness centre (Class E) and wedding and events venue (Sui Generis) with guest sleeping accommodation and parking.”

“The proposed development at Hemingford Park entails a change of use to enable the estate to function as a wedding venue and wellness centre. This will create a viable and sustainable future for the estate by diversifying its use and enhancing public access and enjoyment of its heritage assets.”

Officer report

The site

The site contains a Grade II* listed hall, parkland, listed buildings, a pool and spa building, agricultural land and existing visitor accommodation.

“Hemingford Park Hall is a Grade ll* Listed private residence situated within generous grounds to the south-west of Hemingford Abbots and within the Hemingfords Conservation Area (CA). Outside of the residential curtilage of Hemingford Park Hall, the parkland is in agricultural use. Within the residential curtilage, there is a pool/spa building and various other ancillary structures – some of which are already in use as short term visitor accommodation.”

“The Hall and associated contemporary buildings are attributed to the architect Decimus Burton and originally constructed in c1843 for the Reverend James Linton. The buildings, garden and Parkland, within which they are located are within the designated Hemingford Abbots Conservation area.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier applications covered agricultural buildings, the pool and spa, events use, a hotel, listed building works, tracks and a replacement greenhouse.

“0500222FUL - Erection of an agricultural building for livestock (APPROVED) • 1400578FUL - Original floor levels re introduced on ground floor of main house. Demolition of shed at rear of the property. Construction of a glazed link to run between the kitchen of the main house to a newly constructed, submerged pool house with sliding glass roof. Pool house will consist of two storeys with swimming pool and associated spa facilities.”

“(APPEALED AGAINST NON- DETERMINATION, APPEAL WITHDRAWN) • 23/01770/LBC & 23/01764/FUL - Change of use of pool building and garden area to use for events and a commercial spa and change of use to agricultural track and hard standing for agricultural and commercial use associated with use of the pool house. (WITHDRAWN) • 24/01218/P3MPA - Change of use of an agricultural building to hotel use (C1).”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the proposal acceptable because heritage, transport, amenity, flood risk, biodiversity and trees could be protected, with benefits outweighing the dwelling loss.

“It is also considered that the proposal is acceptable in regard to the transport, highways (including highway safety), odour, noise, flood risk, biodiversity and trees.”

“Against that, there are several benefits to consider. Regarding the heritage benefits, the site is currently within private ownership (residential and agricultural) and the proposed change of use would increase public access to site due to its commercial operation which would better reveal the significance of the heritage assets for the enjoyment of the public.”

Officer report

Consultees’ views

The parish council objected, while the highway, environmental health, flood, ecology and fire authorities raised no objection or requested conditions.

“Cambridgeshire County Council Highway Authority – No objection subject to conditions.”

“Huntingdonshire District Council Environmental Health Officer – No objection subject to condition…”

Officer report

Residents’ views

Fifty-two local residents or neighbouring properties objected over heritage, traffic, noise, parking, ecology, flooding and other impacts; 61 residents supported the proposal’s economic benefits.

“Letters of objection were received from 52 local residents/neighbouring properties during the course of the application. The concerns raised have been summarised below: • The proposal would harm the historic setting through increased traffic, noise, lighting, and commercial activity • Impact of the track upon the ridge and furrow, setting of the Listed Building and Conservation Area • Weddings will be late spring to early autumn resulting in most events taking place…”

“Letters of support were received from a total of 61 residents (comprising of local businesses, local residents/neighbouring properties and residents from nearby villages/towns etc). The support raised have been summarised below: • Long term use of heritage assets • New commercial enterprise • Economic benefits for the local area in terms of employment and spending 7. ASSESSMENT”

Officer report

Committee decision

The committee resolved that the application be not determined after further information relating to the application was received.

“Following receipt of further information relating to the application, it was…”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies Kevin Paul Gulson Conservative, Jon Neish Conservative

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors and Democracy Club.

Sources

  • Huntingdonshire Development Management Committee minutes, 20 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Huntingdonshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Monday 20 October 2025
Committee decided
Deferred
Councillors
14Lib Dem 5Independent 4Conservative 3Independent 1Labour 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

5 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →